The claim that boneless chicken can have bones sounds ridiculous. However, the suit is about whether the restaurant should be liable for its chicken food (which naturally has bones) not being 100% bone free. I think it is a high bar and no restaurant should be held to that level. I do not believe a restaurant should be held negligent and liable for all the medical bills because they did not remove every last piece of bone from the chicken.
Yes, this is an important nuance that’s being overlooked, but I do agree with the dissent that there’s enough here for a jury to decide. Classic question of fact as to whether ordinary care was used at the various steps of the process.
The claim that boneless chicken can have bones sounds ridiculous. However, the suit is about whether the restaurant should be liable for its chicken food (which naturally has bones) not being 100% bone free. I think it is a high bar and no restaurant should be held to that level. I do not believe a restaurant should be held negligent and liable for all the medical bills because they did not remove every last piece of bone from the chicken.
Yes, this is an important nuance that’s being overlooked, but I do agree with the dissent that there’s enough here for a jury to decide. Classic question of fact as to whether ordinary care was used at the various steps of the process.