- cross-posted to:
- apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
This video tests three different cables, ranging from cheap to really expensive and explains the differences between each other
This video tests three different cables, ranging from cheap to really expensive and explains the differences between each other
Anyone have a TLDW?
Here is an AI generated summary.
The host, C, tests various USB-C cables, including an original MacBook cable, a certified 240W Apple cable, and a Thunderbolt 4 cable.
The original MacBook cable can handle up to 100W and operates at USB 2.0 speeds (480 Mbps).
The original cable is identified as an active USB PD cable, capable of 20V and 5A, but lacks support for USB 3 or 4.
The 240W rated cable also operates at USB 2.0 speeds and can handle up to 48V and 5A, indicating suitability for higher power delivery.
Both cables are confirmed to be genuine Apple products with similar vendor IDs, and their condition is noted to be in good health.
Limitations of the tested cables regarding data transfer capabilities are highlighted, while their charging potential is emphasized.
The speaker discusses testing various Thunderbolt cables, confirming compatibility and correct functionality.
Performance metrics for the Thunderbolt cables include a data speed of 40 Gbps and a charging power of 100 watts, with a warning about a “shorted pin.”
The cables claim to support USB 4 capabilities, with technical details provided about voltage and amperage ratings.
All tested cables are operational for charging a MacBook, though a more powerful charger and cable may be necessary for higher power demands.