• RockyC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I feel like this is a product looking for a market. Why would anyone ever trust that much data to something so fragile and easy to lose?

    • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      4k Drones, upgradeable phones, DLSR cameras, Data per weight etc.

      I own a 1tb ssd for my Steam Deck, literally 0 complaints, runs real fast, can’t feel any heat, never need to take it out other than if I’m factory resetting, it’s perfect! (though Valves next deck should just have a bigger ssd slot)

      • Venator@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Also could be handy for smuggling banned movies/tv shows into authoritarian countries that block or outlaw unauthorised VPNs?

        • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Though for the price these will retail for, would probably be easier to take more, smaller capacity cards…

      • Venator@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Also useful for devices where you want more storage but the device only has an SD card slot, or other slots are already occupied or sd card is just easier such as phones, Nintendo switch, steam deck, ultra light laptops, raspberry pi…

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They’re not for long term storage, they’re for transient storage like photography, in particular stuff like surveillance cameras

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        if you want long term CCTV setup properly you should be using ethernet connected security cameras and then transmitting it back to a central server with a hdd always recording. It’s much more reliable and way more cost effective, just requires you running an ethernet cable to where the camera is.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It depends on the type of location, small remote locations might not even get their own local network

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            with ethernet the live feed is perfectly fine, and there is no remote downloading, it’s all streamed over the ethernet to a central box which handles everything from there. You might need some decode/encode capabilities, but to my understanding a lot of cameras will run multiple hardware encodes straight from the sensor over to the network already. So you probably don’t need much.