UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoPhilosopher tries to convince ChatGPT that it's consciousyoutu.beexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkPhilosopher tries to convince ChatGPT that it's consciousyoutu.beUraniumBlazer@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squareJustARaccoon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoYou cannot convince something that has no consciousness, it’s an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt
minus-squareUraniumBlazer@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months ago You cannot convince something that has no consciousness Why not? It’s an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt And why can’t that be intelligence? What does it mean to be “convinced”? What does consciousness even mean? Making definitive claims like these on terms whose definitions we do not understand isn’t logical.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-22 months ago It’s an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt And why can’t that be intelligence? Because human intelligence does far more than respond to prompts with the average response from a data set.
You cannot convince something that has no consciousness, it’s an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt
Why not?
And why can’t that be intelligence?
What does it mean to be “convinced”? What does consciousness even mean?
Making definitive claims like these on terms whose definitions we do not understand isn’t logical.
Because human intelligence does far more than respond to prompts with the average response from a data set.