• Endward23@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They famously jailed several Microsoft execs when they didn’t hand over some emails a few years ago.

    And somehow, thats a good thing? To break the security of communication on demand of the gouverment?

    • NoFuckingWaynado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I never said it was a good thing. I was just commenting on the aggressive nature of Brazil LEO. Microsoft in particular bends over backwards for any gov’t or LEO. I can only assume the Feds got substantial leverage over them, perhaps by manipulating the antitrust cases. Same tactics they use on the smaller guys works on the big corps too I guess. Top customer of MS legal compliance is by far the US Fed with 5000-7000 blanket surveillance of Americans presumably part of PRISM. Second highest is definitely Brazil, and they are very demanding and impatient.

      Back in 2016, MS was advertising Customer Lockbox as an answer to gov’t intrusion into customer privacy. It sounded perfect. Customer gets encryption keys so MS cannot comply with lawful interception requests. I think Apple does this, and it works well for them and their customers. However today I cannot tell if MS lied, dismantled this aspect of this feature, or buried it such that no one uses this ability.

      While we’re talking about MS playing snitch, watch out for Windows 11 and the TPM hardware requirement. Sure this might be a useful tool to fight ransomware scammers, but it definitely can also be used to fingerprint a PC and make everything potentially traceable. Look up machine identification code aka yellow dots for a nifty parallel in the printer world (pun intended).

      • Endward23@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Back in 2016, MS was advertising Customer Lockbox as an answer to gov’t intrusion into customer privacy.

        Got it. Sorry for the missunderstanding.