• A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago
    Pavel Valeryevich Durov

    (Russian: Павел Валерьевич Дуров; born 10 October 1984)[4] is a Russian-born Emirati entrepreneur who is known for founding the social networking site VK and the app Telegram Messenger. He is the younger brother of Nikolai Durov. As of 29 September 2022, his net worth is estimated at US$15.1 billion. In 2022, he was recognized as the richest expat in the United Arab Emirates, according to Forbes. In February 2023, Arabian Business named him the most powerful entrepreneur in Dubai.


    translation of major allegation :
    “The (French) Justice system considers that the lack of moderation, cooperation with law enforcement, and the tools offered by Telegram (disposable numbers, cryptocurrencies, etc.) make it an accomplice to drug trafficking, pedocriminal offenses, and scams.”

    • ravhall@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Gotta add that “pedocriminal” thing so people don’t argue against it. Don’t wanna be seen “supporting pedocriminals” by supporting encrypted communications

      • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        The catch-22 is that it’s impossible to make this tool freely available as-is without also enabling the child abuse. You can’t pry the apart, or at the very least nobody has managed to yet.

        So do we accept the abuse and let it proliferate, in the name of privacy? Or do we sacrifice privacy to make sure theres not a safe place for abusers?

        There is no answer where no one gets hurt. It sucks when the interests of good align with the interests of bad, and it’s a shit show one way or the other.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          The catch-22 is that it’s impossible to make this tool freely available as-is without also enabling the child abuse.

          The catch-22 is that it’s impossible to make roads freely available as-is without also enabling road rage.

          The lack of implanted radio telemetry devices in our dicks “enables” rape.

          Basically, fuck off with that idiotic horseshit.

          • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            But roads are heavily regulated and monitored. In fact, they’re directly managed by the government. If I experience road rage I can call the police with the license plate number and there’s databases of drivers with pictures and VINs etc. This is not the point you think you were making.

            the lack of implanted radio telemetry …

            Absolutely wild that you’re accusing others of idiotic horseshit

        • ravhall@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          The Catholic Church abuses kids, so… ban that. Ban adults alone in a room with a child—something could happen. Oh, sometimes they get abuse at school… so, that’s gotta go. Oh no, they get abused on the internet… bye bye internet.

          You can’t say “this could be used to abuse a child” because you could abuse a child with a spoon, but I’ll be damned if I’ll eat soup with a fork.

          • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            The Catholic Church should absolutely face dire consequences for the abuse they perpetuate and defend. Loss of tax status, prison for all abusers and those who assisted them in avoiding jail. You are making a great parallel.

            It’s not that it “could be” used to abuse a child, wtf. It’s that is has already been widely adopted. It’s currently happening. Same as the Catholic Church.

            You’re really trying hard to make this about “possible” crimes while ignoring the material ones.

            • ravhall@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              No I’m not. Stopping private conversations will only hurt people. Kids will continue to be abused regardless. They were before Telegram, they will be after. Any “protect the children” by removing rights is never about the children.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          I’d argue that, while privacy comes at a cost to society, it’s an essential building block of democracy.

          Unfortunately, we cannot uncover messages of child abusers without also helping uncover messages of opposition leaders, for example.

          Also, as our lives move more and more digital, basic expectation of personal privacy online becomes part of comfortable digital living. We all have things we don’t want a random dude in the uniform to see, even if there’s nothing criminal in there at all.

          That said, total digital surveillance is probably gonna cost us more than digital privacy, but government has a lot to gain from it, which is, to my mind, why we have this unpopular thing pushed so hard in the first place. Public is generally very vocal about NOT wanting this.

      • XNX@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        I agree but its not even an encrypted messenger. Almost no one uses the weak encryption and im pretty sure they offer decryption to governments considering they were threatened to be banned in russia and avoided it

      • einkorn@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        The issue I see with Telegram is that they retain a certain control over the content on their platform, as they have blocked channels in the past. That’s unlike for example Signal, which only acts as a carrier for the encrypted data.

        If they have control over what people are able to share via their platform, the relevant laws should apply, imho.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Who the hell writes a bot to fail loudly like this? If you can’t identify the source, shut the fuck up.

    • A_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      TF1 (… standing for Télévision Française 1) is a French commercial television network … TF1’s average market share of 24% makes it the most popular (french) domestic network.

      • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Yeah but how am I supposed to know what my knee jerk reaction to this story should be if someone doesn’t tell me whether it’s a left or right publication?

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      I can really see how this bot helps the moderation team and somehow lowers their volume of work as they’ve claimed multiple times for keeping it around despite everyone hating it for some reason or another.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    I’m pretty sure that telegrams do collaborate a lot when it comes to crimes.

    Pretty sure that this is a copyright thing as always. I get several scams tries each month on WhatsApp and phone call. But they don’t care about people trying to steal actual money, they just care if I use telegram to watch a TV show without letting Disney murder my wife.