• BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ll thank them when they stop remaking perfectly fine utilities over minor issues then doing a shitty job with compatibility.

    • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Example?

      Podman, virt-manager, toolbx, tuned are the software I know. I could agree on a few that redoing some is bad

      • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Fucking podman… Oh man. I have lost way too many hours dealing with podman.

        It’s frustrating, because they’ve put so much into it. It’s close enough that vendors think they can get away with saying their containers are compatible and they’ve probably really honestly tested for brief periods and it really usually is close enough that you don’t discover the differences until you’re already very well established, but then it’s just a little different and it takes you FOREVER to find out why but then the only option once you do find that out is to completely start over from scratch with docker. And, almost no vendor is going to treat them differently because if we talk to redhat, the first note we’ll get back is that everything we’re trying to do should be fully compatible and there should be no need to worry about that. And, then eventually after a few weeks, it’s docker’s fault that IT WORKS IN DOCKER AND NOT IN PODMAN. Docker needs to go fix it so it’s broken for them too, it’s not a bug for podman, the problem is with the one that’s working.

        I’m a bit traumatized, not always the same, but this isn’t a singular occurrence.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, that’s definitely worse than all the benefits they mentioned. 🙄