so this is just like napster except now I don’t get to listen either ?
You can if you pay them for the pirated material.
Idk, usually people shut down their business if it can’t make a profit…
Oh no. Anyway…
It’s impossible for me to make money without robbing a bank, please let me do that parliament it would be so funny
Honestly this meme is way understating the sinisterness
- Election interference for money machine
- Whole internet is ads company
- Dopamine addiction for all your children
- Superpowers for law enforcement
Y’all have the wrong take. Fuck copyright.
Until the society we live under no longer reflects capitalist values, copyright is a good and necessary force. The day that that changes is when people may give credence to your view.
“Too fucking bad”
I can’t have a chill movie night at home with friends without being able to pirate movies for free.
Cool. If OpenAI gets a pass, then piracy should be legal, right? I mean what good is a trademark or copyright law?
Edit: “I can’t make money without stealing other people’s work” is definitely a take
No, see, piracy is just you downloading movies for yourself. To be like OpenAI you need to download it, put it in a pretty package with a bow, then sell it over and over again. Only when it’s piracy for profit do you get to beg and plead for a pass.
So if I download a movie and use a voice changer to change all the dialog to sound like the donkey from Shrek, I should be good.
When you get this to work, hit me up for some venture capital.
But I’m an aspiring artist, without pirating thousands of movies and TV shows, I’ll never make my ‘highly profitable’ magnum opus!
You’re not repackaging and selling it on for profit tho. That’s different and thus illegal because reasons
If they win, we can just train a CNN on a single 4k hdr movie until it’s extremely fitted, and then it’s legal to redistribute
What crimes can I get away with using the same idea?
So this is an open source public utility, right?
Good artists copy, great artists steal. If I think even Steve Jobs mentioned having in mind their visit in Xerox Parc research lab
Wait, steal = taking away from the original owner
Meaning, good artist copy, while great artist display anticompetitive behavior?
Oh yeah, Picasso. The great artist who was an abusive guy who beat her mistress to paint her crying (The Weeping Woman / Dora Maar).
I only want to know how did you bump on this off topic
Beyond the legal aspect, AI training on artists’ works poses an ethical problem. And when it comes to ethics, I think we can avoid quoting Picasso,
What kind of a pathetic statement is that ?
