AI firms propose ‘personhood credentials’ to combat online deception, offering a cryptographically authenticated way to verify real people without sacrificing privacy—though critics warn it may empower governments to control who speaks online.

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Digital IDs are fine.

    For an extremely small handful of scenarios where an actual ID is required, like banking.

    It absolutely should be a violation of federal law, with massive, extremely punitive consequences, to use it for age verification for adult content, let alone social media or other websites.

    • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I for one would be fine with a digital ID to be used for even age verification, so long as it is only used for verification and is completely detached from any other form of identification. Honestly I’m getting kinda sick of rumors of Russian and Chinese trolls, true or not, as well as AI commenters influencing genuine discourse.

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Right now I could go create 30 sock puppet accounts to respond to this. Is that really a good thing?

      Let government offer the service of “here is a way any human can certifiably identify themselves online” and let people decide what providers they want to give that info to.

      If you want to use or run anonymous social media, that’s fine.

      I don’t.