Social media platforms like Twitter and Reddit are increasingly infested with bots and fake accounts, leading to significant manipulation of public discourse. These bots don’t just annoy users—they skew visibility through vote manipulation. Fake accounts and automated scripts systematically downvote posts opposing certain viewpoints, distorting the content that surfaces and amplifying specific agendas.

Before coming to Lemmy, I was systematically downvoted by bots on Reddit for completely normal comments that were relatively neutral and not controversial​ at all. Seemed to be no pattern in it… One time I commented that my favorite game was WoW, down voted -15 for no apparent reason.

For example, a bot on Twitter using an API call to GPT-4o ran out of funding and started posting their prompts and system information publicly.

https://www.dailydot.com/debug/chatgpt-bot-x-russian-campaign-meme/

Example shown here

Bots like these are probably in the tens or hundreds of thousands. They did a huge ban wave of bots on Reddit, and some major top level subreddits were quiet for days because of it. Unbelievable…

How do we even fix this issue or prevent it from affecting Lemmy??

  • rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The indieweb already has an answer for this: Web of Trust. Part of everyone social graph should include a list of accounts that they trust and that they do not trust. With this you can easily create some form of ranking system where bots get silenced or ignored.

    • grepe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was thinking about something like this but I think it’s ultimately not enough. You have essentially just two possible ends stages for this:

      1. you only trust people that you personally meet and you verified their private key directly and then you will see only posts/interactions from like 15 people. the social media looses its meaning and you can just have a chat group on signal.

      2. you allow some length of chains (you trust people [that are trusted by the people]^n that you know) but if you include enough people for social media to make sense then you will eventually end up with someone poisoning your network by trusting a bot (which can trust other bots…) so that wouldn’t work unless you keep doing moderation similar as now.

      i would be willing to buy a wearable physical device (like a yubikey) that could be connected to my computer via a bluetooth interface and act as a fido2 second factor needed for every post but instead of having just a button (like on the yubikey) it would only work if monitoring of my heat rate or brainwaves would check out.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why does have it to be one or the other?

        Why not use all these different metrics to build a recommendation system?

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The way I imagine it working is if I notice a bot in my web, I flag it, and then everyone involved in approving the bot loses some credibility. So a bad actor will get flushed out. And so will your idiot friend that keeps trusting bots, so their recommendations are then mostly ignored.

        • grepe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          that is an interesting idea. still… you can create an account (or have a troll farm of such accounts) that will mainly be used to trust bots and when their reputation goes down you throw them away and create new ones. same as you would do with traditional troll accounts… you made it one step more complicated but since the cost of creating bot accounts is essentially zero it doesn’t help much.

          • rglullis@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Just add “account age” to the list of metrics when evaluating their trust rank. Any account that is less than a week old has a default score of zero.

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            But those bots don’t have any intersection with my network, so their trust score is low.

            If they do connect via one of my idiot friends, that friend loses credit, too, and the system can trust his connections less.

            The trust level is from my perspective, not global.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Every time I see this implemented, it always seems like screwing over the end user who is trying to join for the first time. Platforms like reddit and Tumblr benefit from a friction-free sign up system.

      Imagine how challenging it is for someone joining Lemmy for the first time and suddenly having to provide trust elements like answering a few questions, or getting someone to vouch for them.

      They’ll run away and call Lemmy a walled garden.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        lol reddit isnt friction free anymore, most subs want you to wait weeks or months before you post.

        Same story, no experience, need work for experience, can’t get work without experience.

      • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Platforms like reddit and Tumblr benefit from a friction-free sign up system.

        Even on Reddit new accounts are often barred from participating in discussion, or even shadowbanned in some subs, until they’ve grinded enough karma elsewhere (and consequently, that’s why you have karmafarming bots).

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Platforms like Reddit and Tumblr need to optimize for growth. We need to have growth, but it is does not be optimized for it.

        Yeah, things will work like a little elitist club, but all newcomers need to do is find someone who is willing to vouch for them.