Today, the Los Angeles Unified School District has a goal of converting at least 30 percent of every schoolyard to green space, a years-long project that it expects to cost $3 billion. By its own estimate, about 475 schools do not meet that standard and, of them, more than 200 elementary schools have less than 10 percent green space. This analysis does not include school parking lots or truck delivery areas — paved surfaces that are likely to remain that way and raise the temperature around schools.

Webster, after years of waiting, is now on the list of schools to be renovated by the Trust for Public Land. The nonprofit will work with a class of third-graders and landscape architects for the next year to design a new schoolyard. Projects like this can take two to three years to complete, at a cost ranging from $400,000 to as much as $2.5 million, said Danielle Denk, who directs the organization’s schoolyard transformation work. In Philadelphia, most of the money for these projects comes from the water department, which is trying to make the city more capable of absorbing storm runoff.

  • gdog05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Plus the kids will have trees to use as cover from shooters. I guess to avoid the packin’ heat Island effect?

      • gdog05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Please don’t take my comment as a light-hearted jab at the idea of school shooters. But rather, it’s a scathing commentary on fixing something like parking lots when children are dying. Maybe I didn’t do a good job of it but that was my intent.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s called at least being able to improve things while half of our country will not compromise on school shootings.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ah yes, running outlockeddoors during lockdown is safer than hiding in your local classroom blindspot.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          If you’re already outside, sure, but otherwise that’s bullshit, excuse my French. At least two people died because they followed the fire drill procedure during the Nashville shooting.

          • corvi@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            I suppose it’s a bit of a unique case; my high school’s classrooms did not have doors, and we were located pretty close to wooded areas. Assuming there is an active shooter inside the building, running was deemed to be the safest choice if available.

            I sometimes forget our architecture was a little nonstandard.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Shooters keep shooting for as long as they want unless they are forcibly stopped. Number of deaths are directly correlated with the duration of their attack. The sooner the attack is stopped, the fewer total deaths and injuries.

              “Run, Hide, Fight” increases any individual’s own survival rate, but paradoxically, “Fight, Hide, Run” increases the survival rate of the entire group, even though it greatly increases risks to the “fighters”.

              Try it with a paintball, airsoft, or squirt-gun wielding attacker and unarmed defenders. Tell the group that as soon as they know where the attacker is, charge him. If you don’t know where he is, hide until you figure it out. If there is no place to hide, run away.