• Worx@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    For those who haven’t read it, it will cost the taxpayer more because he’d need more security if he was sitting in a different seat

    • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is totally reasonable and no he couldn’t buy those same tickets himself and no I’m not taking any questions

      /s

    • pgp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because it’s absolutely essential that he’s present for the match, right?

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Asking people to give up their lives, hobbies, and anything that brings them joy when they go into politics isn’t the way to get quality candidates.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not going to a football match doesn’t mean you have to give up everything that makes you happy.

          If that’s literally the only thing that’d make him happy, he’s got much bigger problems in life.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      That does actually sound like a good point.

      Sitting in the cheap seats to look like one of the people, and costing a fortune in security, would no doubt attract equal viritrol.