• 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You’re gonna get downvoted because of 8.1.

    But yes, I do agree, 8.1 was great, a lot better than 10. The problem with it was the start menu (easily fixable) and the fact that MS didn’t invest money or time in it after 10 came out, so a lot of bugs went unfixed.

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I never minded the metro menu tbh.

      It’s funny that windows tried to do what is done on Linux (gnome) and Mac and got blasted for it.

      I use a full screen style start menu everywhere else.

      • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It was way too early. If that happened after 11, very few would mind. But it happened way too early. 7 had the classic 6.x kernel start menu, and 8 suddenly had… no start menu button at all 😬. That was their mistake, way too much change way too early.