• prunerye@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    3 months ago

    I guess RAM is a bell curve now.

    • 32GB: Enough.
    • 16GB: Not enough.
    • 8GB: Not enough.
    • 4GB: Believe it or not, enough.
    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      3 months ago

      I actually audibly laughed when Raspberry Pi came out with an 8GB version because for anyone who thinks 4GB isn’t enough probably won’t be happy with 8 either.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I wonder what the hell they are doing with it? I mean I have the 3B with IIRC 1GB and I can use the desktop and run python scripts to fiddle with all the I/O ports and stuff, what do you do with a raspberry that needs eight times the RAM??

        I’m seriously curious!

    • AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I have experienced this myself.

      My main machine at home - a M2 Pro MacBook with 32GB RAM - effortlessly runs whatever I throw at it. It completes heavy tasks in reasonable time such as Xcode builds and running local LLMs.

      Work issued machine - an Intel MacBook Pro with 16GB RAM - struggles with Firefox and Slack. However, development takes place on a remote server via terminal, so I do not notice anything beyond the input latency.

      A secondary machine at home - an HP 15 laptop from 2013 with an A8 APU and 8GB RAM (4GB OOTB) - feels sluggish at times with Linux Mint, but suffices for the occasional task of checking emails and web browsing by family.

      A journaling and writing machine - a ThinkPad T43 from 2005 maxed out with 2GB RAM and Pentium M - runs Emacs snappily on FreeBSD.

      There are a few older machines with acceptable usability that don’t get taken out much, except for the infrequent bout of vintage gaming