“Fidelity is currently valuing X at about $9.4 billion”

I found this funny.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    We knew this was going to happen before he made the purchase.

    Everyone said, the best way for Elon to keep his money was to change very little, or even take a hands-off approach.

    Masnick suggested this would happen

    It was that and so much worse. Moral of the story: Running a huge social media service is hard. Maybe don’t assume that because you’re a billionaire you’re the best at doing stuff.

    • Gloomy@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Masnick gives 20 levels of development. Elon stopped here:

      Level Two: “We’re the free speech platform! But no CSAM!”

      And that’s about it. Ex-Twitter has copyright infringement, hate speech and doesn’t give a fuck about local laws unless the law actually has teeth (Brasil, anybody?).

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Masnick’s post is well put, but also a disturbing reminder of how much power nation-states can exert over the Internet.

      • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Twitter wasn’t profitable right? So most of the “value” is in the name of the product. Elon changed the name and added his signature to everything the platform was doing, completely changing the platform Twitter is. So yeah, I do get why 75% of the money is gone now.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Changing the name of one of the most valuable brands isn’t something I’d expect even him to do.