• Lugh@futurology.todayOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    They quote a cost of $1,000 per square meter (S100 sq foot). So I arrived at my calculation assuming a size of 100 sq m/1,000 sq feet for an average ‘starter home’ 2-bedroom dwelling.

    The fact that housing crises are occurring in so many Western countries suggests to me that there is something very fundamental that is broken and wrong with our system of supplying housing - one of life’s most basic human necessities.

    If the system is the problem, then the system can’t provide the solution, perhaps only radical new ways of doing things can?

    Germans have a system of purchasing property called “Wohnungsgenossenschaften”. It is where individuals come together in a not-for-profit cooperative, to build and finance their own apartment buildings and housing complexes. This technology seems a perfect fit for that, maybe we would all be better off in other western countries if we adopted this system more?

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      A problem is zoning laws. When they don’t let people build in places people want to live, what can you do?

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Which are actually mentioned in here! Obviously it’s not a barrier everywhere, though. They don’t really do it in the same way in Europe.

      • Lugh@futurology.todayOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        In most countries, people elect the local officials who make zoning decisions. It’s not a fundamental barrier.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yes. They got rid of single-home zoning in the big city nearest to me, recently. Check back in 10 years to find out how that went.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    So the main original thing I’m hearing is just the software that streamlines a lot of the process. Other than that, people have been designing factories as a service for a long time, and factories have been making prefabs for a long time. I’m curious how their prefab concepts compare to existing ones, as well, which the blog didn’t go into (instead opting for a lot of manager-speak and Ford worship).

    Instead of paying workers hourly, Cuby pays them based on the quants of the tasks completed. When workers complete a task, they push a button in Cuby’s app, and after three tasks, a supervisor checks the work to confirm satisfactory completion. Once confirmed, payment is automatically sent to the worker’s account.

    Well, I guess I shouldn’t be surprised they’re going with the gig model. It’s just too good of a deal for the employer. We made labour rules for a reason, though, and it’s up to regulators to actually enforce them.

    For reference, they’re still expecting workers on site during their shift.

    • Lugh@futurology.todayOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      For sure there is a certain amount of hype here. That said much of their thinking seems like it could be sound. But I want to see stuff like this working in practice, not just theoretically. I guess we will have to wait and see.