• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    … unless the customer is over 18, right? The age where an age rating doesn’t fucking matter?

    This is the same shit as Australia “refusing classification.” Oh cool, guess it’ll default to the highest bar to entry, oh no wait the whole thing was just an excuse to censor fictional people taking imaginary drugs.

  • choco@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Older titles should be restricted to +18 by default, at least they would stay purchasable.

  • missingno@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Requiring new releases to provide this information going forward makes sense. But I expect a lot of older titles have no one actively paying attention to go get this paperwork filled out, and will get blocked as a result. This law should’ve just applied to everything new released after the law takes effect, grandfathering in legacy content.

    • TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Considering a lot of games on steam don’t have a rating at all, it’s probably going to affect damn near everything but AAA games, honestly