Just started getting this now. Hopefully it’s some A/B testing that they’ll stop doing, but I’m not holding my breath

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    My question is if it wasn’t required before and is required now, what changed? It’s not like Google has added a killer feature recently - this is almost certainly related to those shitty AI answers that are forcing your actual search results even further down the page than they were already.

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      It wasn’t required, but id wager 99% of website that exist currently run JS in some form or another for something.

      Id wager its impossible to have anything dynamic on a webpage without JS (minus visual dynamics which can be handled with css), at that point you have to replace it with a different programming language and every browser needs to completely change gears to allow other code to run instead. But what advantage is gained by changing to another programming language? Cleaner code w/ less jankyness? Sure I guess, but we would be moving mountains to accomplish a silly thing.

      I’m wondering if many people in this thread understand what JS is and does.

    • auzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Even things like lazy loading and such require js though

      A lot of features might not be obvious honestly

      If you’re interested though, you could check the source which should be able to tell you immediately what they use it for