L’année dernière le sujet a été abordés par @AlexisFR@jlai.lu et je souhaite relancé l’idée de dé-fédérer de cette instance.

Je navigue depuis quelque temps sans bloquer la moindre instances question de simuler un peu l’expérience de quelqu’un qui rejoint le fediverse via l’instance jlai.lu.

Les posts qui apparaissent dans le fil et le comportement de la plupart des usagers de cette instance pollue tout simplement l’expérience Lemmy.

Même sans parler de possible liens avec CCP, Kremlin etc… je pense que, à mon humble avis, leur comportement et leur façons de brigader et de diffamer une opinion qui ne diverge que d’à peine d’un poil de leur courant de penser, va sincèrement à l’encontre de l’état d’esprit de notre communauté sur cette instance.

Je me suis opposé sans vraiment me prononcer l’année dernière à une dé-fédération (étant donné qu’ils ne sont pas francophone et que j’aime bien le drama inter-instances de temps temps) mais leurs prises de positions en permanence ahurissantes et (en pesant mes mots au maximum) d’une flagrante dissonance cognitive je dois dire que trop c’est trop.

Je pense sincèrement que malgré le fait nos intéractions soit assez minimes avec cette instance je pense que sur le long terme leur influence est nocive et que, dans l’idée de garder une certaines sérénité pour les personnes et futures personnes qui utiliseront cette instance, qu’il y ai une dé-fédération de cette instance de la notre.

  • happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    13 days ago

    The person who thinks non-whites are gangstalking them is on the same forum as the person who uses “tanky” as a slur against the only forum which strictly opposes all of the groups currently using tanks. I would ask how you see yourself ideologically, but you aren’t making a good case for not being a fascist forum so that definition wouldn’t mean much. Look at the company you keep. Who else online is obsessed with tankies and Asian conspiracies? Not the left-wing ones.

    • Snoopy@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 days ago

      We have no post supporting capitalism. The whole server is critizing capitalism and supporting social and environnemental project.

      • happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        13 days ago

        It’s great you have that perspective on it individually. You individually might be totally fine. I ask you the same question though: look at the company you keep. One of your mods, a full 1/8th of your monthly userbase, just used tankie as a slur. Against a forum that’s… what? Too antizionist? Too antiracist? Too anti-imperialist? Too pro-LGBT? I still don’t know either of their specific ideological disagreements with Hexbear and don’t care. If I were you I’d be sceptical of people who use words the right-wing uses to describe the same enemies the right-wing has. A nebulous term like tankie can be used to condemn anyone. An out-group enemy that only exists through conspiracy theories can be used to condemn anyone. Neither can be specifically defined in the same way me using “liberal” or “fascist” as an in-group enemy can be. If you feel genuinely committed to something as radical as environmentalism, you’re too radical for that forum and you’ll be the tankie or the sneaky Asian spy when they run out of more radical candidates. I wouldn’t want to be on Hexbear if people used language like that unironically.

        • Camus (il, lui)@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          One of your mods, a full 1/8th of your monthly userbase, just used tankie as a slur.

          How did you come to that number? Our total monthly userbase is 220 users per month for the instance.

          • happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            13 days ago

            I’m just going off the number on the sidebar when I’m viewing your instance through this one. Now it’s diluted by this thread and it says 55 users/month, but when I first saw the thread it was at 8/month. Lemmy can be weird about syncing with other things so it might be that: https://i.imgur.com/ODSkS0n.png .

            • Camus (il, lui)@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              13 days ago

              Yeah those counters are usually quite inaccurate, you always have to check on the source instance to be sure.

        • Snoopy@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          Français
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          May i convaince you otherwise about this mod ? Here is Anansi (sysop) answer to TheFirish :

          N’ayant fait part d’aucun exemple concret, je ne vois pas pourquoi on défédèrerait une instance historique.

          La seule participation active de leurs membres à l’instance (jlai.lu), est, de mémoire, dans ce thread, ce qui me semble justifié.

          Si tu ne souhaites pas voir le contenu d’Hexbear, tu peux la blacklister dans tes options de profil, comme toute autre instance, depuis une ou deux versions de lemmy.


          Having not given any concrete examples, I do not see why we would defederate from a historical instance.

          The only active participation of their members in the instance (jlai.lu) is, from memory, in this thread, which seems justified to me.

          If you don’t want to see hexbear’s content, you can blacklist it in your profile options, like any other instance, since one or two versions of lemmy.


          We had another post about defederating Hexbear long before, almost one year ago where TGhost, thank to her, talked to anansi and convainced him to keep the federation with hexbear.

          If you can comment here, and see our posts that’s due to @anansi’s decision and @TGhost’s argument.

          Currently, in this thread, heated arguments, meme, trolling, wich are spreading to the whole lemmyverse aren’t helping us. They are a fun thing to do but it often end up badly.

          Anyway, i hope that translation and this historical decisions/fact from jlai.lu, can give you a new perspective on jlai.lu and anansi.

          You can trust us and let us handle the situation.

        • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          It’s the common perspective. You’d know if you knew what you’re talking about, but I guess you can’t help the constant shitposting without doing a modicum of research.

          This instance is eminently left-wing (just not the way you redfash supporting genocides that aren’t the genocide of the Palestinians are).

          And no, calling someone a tankie does not make anyone a fascist, no matter how many times you’ll repeat it. You’re getting high on your own farts, but nobody outside of your bubble believes that ridiculous shit.

          Read the room.

        • Camus (il, lui)@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          If you feel genuinely committed to something as radical as environmentalism, you’re too radical for that forum and you’ll be the tankie or the sneaky Asian spy when they run out of more radical candidates.

          Attention Snoopy, méfie-toi de nous, on est anti activisme environnemental 😆

          • happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            13 days ago

            I’m not saying you’re anti-environmentalists. Plenty of liberals are environmentalists. I’m saying that I’ve seen two users, including a mod, use undefinable words that have one rhetorical purpose. You use a word like “tankie” or an idea like “all my enemies are foreign spies” to set a limit on dissent. I could ask that user what the specific line between a tankie and non-tankie is, but if that answer even makes sense then it sets a firm limit on how radical someone can be. I’m an eco-Marxist, I study it as closely as I can and work practically as one, the books on my shelf are mostly about what I’d consider part of an eco-Marxist critique. I understand environmentalism as a complex intersectional war of liberation. What part of that makes me a tankie versus the acceptable position? If there’s preemptive surrender to power, if some part of that intersectional struggle is unacceptable or some act or idea or theorist is too far, I don’t care how many paintings you’ve splashed with soup today.

            • anansi@jlai.luM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 days ago

              Meh, I use tanky to differentiate between leftists and people that cosplay as leftist while excusing genocide and human rights violation whenever it’s their flavor of autocrat doing it, not really as an anti-communist word since nobody uses it like that in the first place.

              it sets a firm limit on how radical someone can be

              No, it sets a limit on how much you accept your fellow comrades from being used as a stepping tool by an authoritarian regime/dictator to be able to call yourself “communist”, while ending up in state capitalism anyway.

              I may concede that from my years on hexbear, I associate most participants to this kind of communism flavor by default, which may not be your case, but this thread did not really start in good faith, so why would I.

              • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                people that cosplay as leftist while excusing genocide and human rights violation whenever it’s their flavor of autocrat doing it

                Democrats?

                • anansi@jlai.luM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  Yes, but not only.

                  So close to understand my obvious point, you can do it!

                  • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    12 days ago

                    Honest question: what do you think of the concept of atrocity propaganda?

                    On October 10, 1990, a young Kuwaiti girl known only as “Nayirah” appeared in front of a congressional committee and testified that she witnessed the mass murdering of infants, when Iraqi soldiers had snatched them out of hospital incubators and threw them on the floor to die… Nayirah was revealed to be the daughter of Kuwait’s ambassador to the United States, and had not actually seen the “atrocities” she described take place

                    When I see the U.S. making claims about one of its enemies doing atrocities, I’m going to be skeptical, because they’ve told that exact sort of lie for the exact same reason plenty of times before.

            • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 days ago

              Nobody believes “tankie” is a slur, except the tankies that feel insulted. Sorry for calling a cat a cat! Maybe you’ll realize after you’re done licking Putin’s boots.

      • propter_hog [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        That is terrific, I’m glad that you are yourself anti-capitalist. I don’t think the whole jlai.lu instance is, though, and at least one mod is apparently quite conservative.

        • leftascenter@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          The whole instance is not anti capitalistic but many of the most active users are and we have dedicated leftist and pro-tolerance communities. The instance is overtly antifascist, the few doubtful users that posted were kicked out promptly.

          The feeling is also anti-authoritarian so tankies wouldn’t feel at ease, but I dont think they’d be kicked out unless blatantly promoting imperialist / authoritarian agendas.

        • anansi@jlai.luM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          If you’re talking about me, that’s kind of a funny way to see it I guess, albeit pretty dumb and most likely lacking in political history for it to be your guess.

        • Snoopy@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          Français
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Well, i’m affraid language barriere doesn’t help…and there is some part of misunderstanding and french’s culture is different 😟

          When we talk about PCC or the Kremlin, we are mainly critizing imperialism. We do make a clear line between communism and imperialism.

          We also critize France, and our actions to change it is currently repressed by the police. We document it there. I don’t read it, it depress me a lot and i have to care about myself.

          https://jlai.lu/c/quefaitlapolice?

          You can also check those communities :

          You can also check @Frirish@jlai.lu posts.

          He has expressed his point of view about hexbear but that doesn’t represent our opinion until proven otherwise.

          The first thing we (anyone, everyone not necessary the mod/admin team) do is talking to people (even modo, admin are included and can be demoted anytime) and pointing out what’s wrong.

          That’s the first thing we did. We asked for source and pointed out it’s normal that you would react here.

          Then, we ask them to edit their post as a way to apologize.

            • Snoopy@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Oui, plus ou moins. Si on lit la définition de wikipédia : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

              Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those who support acts of repression by such regimes or their allies.

              On peut faire le parralèles avec les l’islamogauchisme utilisé par la droite contre la FI pour la qualifier d’extreme.

              Après, OP a apporté des précisions avec des liens.

              • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                On peut faire un parallèle. Mais à la différence de l’islamogauchimse, le mot décrit à la base quelque chose de réel.

                Et son agitation, fût-elle fantasmatique, ne fait pas de son utilisateur un facho, pas plus que JM Blanquette est un facho pour avoir utilisé le facheux vocable “islamogauchimse”.

                On va pas refaire le débat de comment les libéraux préparent le terrain pour les fachos, puisqu’on va vite tomber d’accord. Mais, de l’aveu même de Cowbee, ces deux positions politiques sont distinctes. Et balancer des étiquettes sur cette base là est caduc.

                Hexagonours, dans le discours, c’est sauter de branche en branche argumentative pour au final dire que t’es un nazi. Exemple dans ce thread:

                1 - un gars associe, indûment ou non, Hexbear à Trump avec un mot prétendument capacitiste.

                2 - critiquer le PCC c’est habituellement fait par des droitards facho sur les Internet.

                3 - donc AlexisFR est un facho.

                4 - ce gusse est toléré. Discutable, perso jlaipalu, puis je suis sûr que meme si tu l’as lu, pas certain qu’il soit facho h24, surtout si les accusations sont aussi légèrement circonstanciées.

                5 - Donc tout le monde ici est un facho par association (la fameuse loi du, si t’as un facho à table, toute la table est facho), peu importe les positions sur le climat, le capitalisme, la moralité des rentes terriennes.

                Le raisonnement est scabreux, et certains n’auraient peut-être pas du tant sécher la philo.

                Mais ils ne vont pas laisser la réalité leur barrer la route 🤭

                • Snoopy@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  C’est un très bon résumé, leur raisonnement est logique comme tu l’as dit.

                  Pour islamogauchisme je veux bien des sources puisque pour le moment j’ai pas d’exemples qui me vient en tete. l’usage d’islamogauchisme remonte bien avant que ce soit popularisé par la droite. Des chercheurs et chercheuses du CNRS sont remonté à la source de ce terme et l’ont retrouvé dans un post sur X qui appartenait à un russe. De là, iels en ont déduit que c’était une ferme à troll :

                  • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    12 days ago

                    Des sources à propos de? Je suis pas un défenseur de ce terme dégueulasse. Le terme qui a un sens initial qui décrit quelque chose de réel, c’est tankie, pas judéobolchévique islamogôchimste.

                    Les tankies à la base sont les défenseurs de l’invasion de la Hongrie avec des chars soviétiques, d’où le mot " tank ie "

    • anansi@jlai.luM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      The person who thinks non-whites are gangstalking them

      The fuck you’re talking about

      the person who uses “tanky” as a slur against the only forum which strictly opposes all of the groups currently using tanks

      >opens hexbear

      >see a meme in the front page using the same rhetoric as Israel when it denies the palestinian genocide, to deny Uyghurs genocide by China

      Kinda selective opposition I guess.

      Look at the company you keep. Who else online is obsessed with genocide denial and defending authoritarian regimes? Not the left-wing ones.

      pepe clown

      • happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        Cool, the person who uses tankie as an insult is an Adrian Zenz fan and has a Nazi frog emoji on hand for logical gotchas.

        Again you are not making a good case here. Snoopy’s giving it their best, but you’re setting off my hitler-detector.