• narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    To me it felt like previous Windows on ARM attempts: promised a lot, released with problems (mainly compatibility this time), then quickly forgotten because x86 chips caught up anyway.

    See you in 2-3 years!

    • Tamo240@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Definitely had issues on first release, but a lot has improved since then without getting much coverage. Btw I wouldn’t say that x86 has ‘caught up’ especially if your metric is power efficiency, not just raw power. Until we see a realistic RISC-V offering arm will likely remain king in that space.

  • SpacePirate@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Either they’re scared of competing with new intel NUC SOCs built on their 18A process, or this confirms their buyout of Intel is happening, and they’re preparing to exit from the laptop/SFF space.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Didn’t Intel cancel NUC because it was just a tiny niche not worth the effort?

      I can’t imagine Qualcomm, who traditionally sells chips to phone makers, has any interest in becoming a vendor of SFF PCs.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Just Qualcomm showing their customary hostility to developers.

    They’re resentful they had to produce dev kits in the first place, so delayed them until after other companies produced retail products.

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Qualcomm Snapdragin X may achieve better success if they followed Apple’s path (a well rounded dev kit), and makes Linux first class support instead of Windows with the Copilot+ PC which proven is a dumpster fire.