• tekato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It can’t be irrelevant as it’s the primary factor in deciding if the fine will even be brought.

    Is DSA the only way for your company to get fined? If the answer is no, then yes, it’s irrelevant. Because while your company may not be eligible for a DSA fine, there are countless different situations which could leave you in the same spot.

    Personal liability applies to many actions under the law

    Yes, but none of those actions involve what is happening here. The DSA clearly states that the company may be fined up to 6% of its yearly revenue.

    your scaremongering of small family business becoming some governments targets are unfounded.

    What scaremongering? This is a valid concern. If Elon Musk’s rights as a company owner can be violated, who says yours can’t?

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I love how you quoted all the parts expect the one that mentions where for this to even apply the person have to misuse corporate assets in the first place. Follow the law, and you are good in the EU, no matter which size business you are.

      If Elon Musk’s rights as a company owner can be violated, who says yours can’t?

      Here you go again. If they decide to go through with it, no Musk rights will be violated, there is extensive legal precedent in the EU that covers this.

      • tekato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I love how you quoted all the parts expect the one that mentions where for this to even apply the person have to misuse corporate assets in the first place.

        Didn’t bother responding to it because it’s irrelevant. Elon Musk is not being accused of misusing corporate assets, he is being accused of not complying with the DSA.

        there is extensive legal precedent in the EU that covers this

        Of course, extensive means many. Point to at least 2 cases in which other assets of a company’s owner were threatened by the EU government due to DSA violations. I know there are none, so I’ll make it easier. Name 2 cases for which the EU went after the owner’s other assets because the fine to the company wasn’t enough, whatever the fine might originate from.