Another angle:

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Speed matters more than mass when calculating kinetic energy. A 767 is much, much faster than a B-25.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      While you’re right, the MTOW of a B-26 is around 17 tons, the 767 is 150-200 tons.

      So there is a factor of around 10 between them, so if the 767 flies 3 times as fast - which it doesn’t, the B-26 cruises at more than 0.35 Mach at close to sea level, and the 767 is not supersonic - that means that the factor from the speed can’t be more than about 3 squared, so 9.

      So the factors from the weight and the speed are roughly equal IMO.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Speed matters more than mass when calculating kinetic energy.

      Are you sure about that? An air rifle shooting supersonic aluminum pellets has considerably less kinetic energy than a .22 LR bullet, because of the weight of the bullet. Some air rifles actually shoot their projectile faster than a .22, but they have like 10x less energy upon impact.