mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 2 days agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1128arrow-down11
arrow-up1127arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squareTraister101@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 day agoGonna need to start calling it C++++ at this point. So much extra shit in the standard library
minus-squareTobias Hunger@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 minutes agoWell, its a brand new standard library. A fresh start.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoHonestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
minus-squareTraister101@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 day agoNah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoSure, not saying C++ isn’t cluttered.
Gonna need to start calling it C++++ at this point. So much extra shit in the standard library
Well, its a brand new standard library. A fresh start.
Honestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
Nah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
Sure, not saying C++ isn’t cluttered.