• cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have a feeling that Microsoft will release an update that will at the very least make Windows 10 miserable to use if not downright unbootable the day support ends

  • Upsidedownturtle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d guess that major UI revisions are a big reason for average users. People don’t like having to relearn how to do something or find a setting. If M$ implemented a legacy UI setting that by and large mimicked the interface and controls in W10 they’d clear a major hurdle preventing less technologically inclined users from upgrading.

    • krippix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My guess is that the average user doesn’t care at all and just clicks away update notifications because they are annoyed by them

  • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Guys, is it the beginning downfall of Windows after October 24, 2025? 🤔

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wish.

      There might be a small uptick of new Linux installs, but MS will just power on and the vast majority of Windows users will remain in that abusive relationship. :sigh:

      • zingo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah. People just don’t make the effort to “learn a new OS”.

        They get crazy if the icons are in some other place than they are used to on Windows.

        Let’s see the facts here ppl.

        • db2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It has more to do with corporations than individuals. Microsoft doesn’t pay the bills from great grandma Ethel’s Windows license, they have a corporate revenue stream they need to keep locked in.

  • Muffi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Imagine a world where we had politicians who understood technology enough to put proper rules and requirements in place, so that big dumb companies would actually be forced to act ethically and sustainably…

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The only reason I’m on 10 with my main pc is because the 7th gen intel in there isn’t compatible with win11. I have another pc that is 7th gen, which I put windows 11 on and there is just something weird about it. When I do anything on that machine it doesn’t do it immediately, it sits for a few seconds before actions are done. Really aggravating. Clicking on a program on the taskbar takes a few seconds before it opens. File explorer, firefox browser, settings pane, … Once programs are running it’s fine to use said programs, but I wonder what they did to make it feel this way.

    I have Linux on both machines as primary OS and they are super snappy, it’s not the hardware.

    • janNatan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      How much RAM do the systems have? 8gb? The delay may be in the system making room in ram for the program. Win11 is so ram hungry. It’s stupid.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They both have 16GB RAM.

        The one with Windows 10 has a i5 7600k and GTX1060

        The one with Windows 11 has a i7 7700k and GTX1080

        Both with nvme ssd storage samsung evo (cant remember which exactly). The 7600k machine even has hdds and ssds via sata extra.

    • Starbuncle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I had Windows 10 on an older (but not ancient) machine and it was literally unusable. 10-15 minute boot time and another 5 or so just to get a browser to open. The misery didn’t end once things were open; everything was still slower than when I had windows 7 on what would now be considered a truly ancient machine. I put Linux on it and experienced a roughly 5x speedup.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I use Win10 for one single program only and I’m currently testing on how to take that machine offline, but still be accessible locally. So far all I got is a blacklist regex in pihole. Blocking internet access to that machine via my router does not work for me, as I dual boot that machine with Linux for gaming. Tips per DM are very welcome actually.

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Static IP on the windows machine in a jail’d subnet, if you still want to be able to access it from the LAN but don’t want it to have internet access.

      If you’re happy with it not having any kind of network access (I’m not sure if when you say ‘locally’ you mean just physically, or it needs LAN as well), just disable the network adapter in windows.

    • undu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Make Linux use a random MAC address, then block the physical MAC in the DHCP section of the router’e configuration. This will make Windows unablento recieve an IP address while Linux will be able to get ahold of one.

      If windows uses tandom mac addresses, the feature should be able to be turned off.

    • ElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Two options:

      • Change the DNS and gateway so they’re pointing to 0.0.0.0
      • Give the Windows install a static IP or lease, and block that IP on the router
    • Chloë (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe have a script change your local IP address? You could for instance change your IP after logging into Linux and change before powering off.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, they could solve it by not making the mandatory successor an ad-laden, AI-infested, personal data harvesting, privacy-nightmare shit show. That would be a start. And also relax whatever the artificial requirement is that makes a lot of Win10 machines incompatible with 11.

    • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nope, they wont. Micro$oft only cares money rather than basic OS for everyday and professional tasks

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They’ve been adding spyware and ads into W10 so it’s not the money. They could easily add all W11 ads/spyware into 10 with an update. Older CPUs have several hardware vulnerabilities unrelated to the TPU required by W11.

        IMO, they should add a startup message listing the hardware vulnerabilities of the installed CPU and leave it up to the customer.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You can bypass the requirements since yeah, they were always artificial. I believe Rufus has an option when creating Win11 install USBs to remove the TPM and other requirements.

      But then again, it’s nice, because all I need to make sure Microsoft doesn’t secretly update my Win10 machine in the night to Win11 is to turn off the TPM in the BIOS.

      • john117@lemmy.jmsquared.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can bypass the requirements since yeah, they were always artificial.

        I think bypassing these checks would eventually render your PC vulnerable? for example, bitlocker support being void for computers that relies on TPM 2.0

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          There is no home-user need to run bitlocker. There’s dozens of alternatives, that do not rely on TPM, that are just as effective, and that you really should be using anyways since they aren’t controlled by M$.

      • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        But then you won’t receive any updates if you use unsupported hardware to run Win 11

      • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Rufus has that option, I’ve used it myself to update to Win11 because I didn’t have a motherboard with TPM at the time.
        Also wanna mention, the reason I updated was mostly because I thought Win10 was kinda ugly and I think Win11 was a huge update in that regard and also because of security reasons, since Win10 won’t receive any more updates in the near future. At the end of the day, I can count on one hand how often I boot Windows in a year (I almost exclusively use Linux), so I don’t really care about all the Win11 bullshit anyway.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Windows 10 is already an ad-laden, AI-infested, personal data harvesting, privacy-nightmare shit show. The problem with 11 is the ridiculous hardware requirements.

      Windows 10 is trash and has always been. Windows 7 was the last good Windows, and I would still use it if it had security updates and DX12 support (I obviously mainly use Linux, but my gaming PC is on Windows, and no, some games I play and software I use 100% do not work on Linux).

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Probably is. I use Linux for everything and only use Win10 at work on a VM with enterprise/LTSB version, so I’ve been shielded from most of its enshittification.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I stopped following 11 news after they cancelled the native android framework, only thing that got me excited since a BlueStacks installation gets huge extremely fast, I’m not going.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    hahahahahah does anyone really think microsoft cares? their money is in business with all the big players already deploying 11 at least in modest amounts.

    nothing stopped them when windows7 was still functional and they were pushing the tpm requirement, i dont see a difference here.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Their money is now in azure. Os and app suites are a declining business, but they help with azure lock in.

  • arsCynic@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “On Windows 10 PCs without an ESU subscription, however, any security flaws found from that day forward will remain unpatched, making those PCs increasingly vulnerable to online attacks.”

    “Windows unpatched […] increasingly vulnerable to online attacks” is a facetious statement since the operating system is inherently malware.