KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Swedish Minister wants to deport migrants who do not hold Swedish citizenship if they show support to terrorist groups.
  • The spokesperson for migration policy in Sweden wants the law to be even more stringent - to include anyone who shows such acts of support.
  • Tourists, citizens, and residence permit holders can all be affected by such changes.
  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    …and let me guess. Critizing Israel’s actions is tacit support of Hezbollah?

    • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Sweden up until recently had freedom of organization protected in the constitution. This was changed in a recent constitutional amendment at the request of Turkey, as a prerequisite to join NATO. Turkey demanded that Sweden arrest “PKK members” (aka journalists that Erdogan doesn’t like), and to show support, both the Andersson and Kristersson administrations revived a constitutional amendment from 2021 and pushed it through, making it illegal to be a member of a terrorist organization.

      https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2021/03/sou-202115/

      https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/220628-trilat-memo.pdf

      https://lagen.nu/2022:666

      It’s really an unfortunate development, since the terms “terrorist organization” and “support to terrorism” is so poorly defined, and it’s clearly intended to punish political opposition in dictatorships, like Turkish and Kurdish opposition in Turkey. Very much a chilling effect on political discussion when foreign political oppositions are banned from speaking in Sweden, even when racist hate groups are still allowed to speak.

      It does seem that the current law is still quite limited, at least. The Terrorist crime law of 2022 (Terroristbrottslagen) outlaws support, propagandizing, and recruiting for terrorist organizations, but this seems to be limited to only material support, organized propaganda and organization leadership. Simply going around waving a PKK flag still is legal, for now.

      https://www.ui.se/utrikesmagasinet/analyser/2023/juli/terrorlagar-domstolar-far-bedoma-flaggviftning/

      So luckily, I don’t think it’s possible to be deported simply for expressing expressing pro-Kurdish or pro-Palestinian independence ideas, or even expressing support for the violent people in PKK or Hamas.

      Johan Forssell has also expressed a wish for a new law making it illegal to be in a criminal gang, but this has not passed yet. His view on the ongoing wars with Israel seems to be that Israel “has a right to defend itself”, but that civilians must be protected and receive aid.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    The same minister probably:

    That party who are against me, I’d call them terrorists!

  • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Wtf is going on sweden?

    How big of an issue can this be lol

    Did all “terrorist” just moved there for some reason?

  • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Good, immigrants who support terrorism don’t belong in Sweden or any other Western country.

    Send them back and let them live with the organization they support.

    • Display name@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      The issue here is citizens are still allowed to support terrorist organisations since it’s part of free opininon and free speech. So it’s a discriminatory law, which is against the principle of rule of law and equality before the law.

    • Jack@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I was about to say you are braindead, but it seems you are just American, I am really sorry.

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        If they are non citizen immigrants and are advocating for terrorist organizations who incite violence then they aren’t a good fit for a Western Democracy and should be deported.

        • untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Support for Palestine is not support for a terrorist organization. But a law such as this could be used on a pro-Palestinian organizer on the false claim that support for Palestine is support for hamas.

          Also, deported where exactly?

          • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            What constitutes a terrorist organization is up to the elected officials and police organizations to define. It is not outlined in the article.

            Non-citizen immigrants who support terrorists should be deported back to their country of origin.

            • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              What constitutes a terrorist organization is up to the electric officials and police organizations to define.

              That’s kind of the point, mate. In the current political climate I half expect them to start describing any organization giving humanitarian aid to Palestinians as terrorists.

              But to ask the real questions: is providing material support to terrorists not already a crime in Sweden? Does having a Swedish criminal record not complicate eg visa renewals and make it harder for someone to stay in or return to the country? Assuming that’s the case, why is this something that needs to be specially handled now? Is this actually a problem, or just a way to stoke racism and fear for political benefit?

  • Display name@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    The law proposal doesn’t affect citizens (according to the government). So it’s a law specifically meant to be unequal.

    Citizen? Cheer for terrorists all you want! It’s your right!

    Non-citizen? Deportion.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      This sounds very unconstitutional? It does say “everyone” so the principle of equality under the law should apply. Right???

      EDIT, aw fuck:

      Non-Swedish citizens and non-Swedish legal persons Art. 3. For those who are not Swedish citizens or Swedish legal persons, special restrictions may be laid down in law in respect of freedom of expression under this Fundamental Law.

      Well that sounds horrible. Sweden, do better.