• realitista@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Still on zwave which works great. Don’t see the point of this standard which runs over an inferior type of networking and is brought to us by the companies that created the interoperability problem in the first place.

    • tekato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Don’t see the point of this standard which runs over an inferior type of networking

      Inferior how? Matter is not comparable to Z-Wave. Z-Wave is a mesh network, Matter is just a standard which would allow Alexa, Siri, Google, etc. to control the same devices. To allow Z-Wave like functionality, Matter is able to work on top of Thread, which is in fact superior to Z-Wave.

      is brought to us by the companies that created the interoperability problem in the first place

      Of course. You don’t want to be the company known for refusing to participate in an open standard, even if you secretly don’t want it to succeed. Anyways, there’s no reason for companies to not want an open standard for controlling smart devices, since it literally helps everyone support more devices for basically no effort once you add support for Matter.

      • realitista@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Inferior range, potential for interference, power consumption, meshing, and security. Name one area where it’s better.

        And I still expect one or more of these companies to break the standard to create their own walled garden.