lemme in@lemm.ee to Privacy@programming.dev · 4 days agoPeriod tracking app refuses to disclose data to American authoritieswww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkPeriod tracking app refuses to disclose data to American authoritieswww.newsweek.comlemme in@lemm.ee to Privacy@programming.dev · 4 days agomessage-square44fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoYes. I worked for Apple for over a decade.
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoYou could be Tim Cook and i would still not believe a word out of your mouth.
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoYou don’t have to. Opinions are subjective, and you’re entitled to believe whatever you’d like. That still doesn’t mean you’re correct.
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-24 days agoI am 100% correct in my assessment that iOS source code is not public which proves every single point i made beyond any doubt. Not a matter of opinion whatsoever.
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoAll you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable. That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven. At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M. Get real.
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-24 days agoIn software security, not proven to be secure = not secure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoProve it. https://security.apple.com/bounty/
Yes. I worked for Apple for over a decade.
You could be Tim Cook and i would still not believe a word out of your mouth.
You don’t have to. Opinions are subjective, and you’re entitled to believe whatever you’d like.
That still doesn’t mean you’re correct.
I am 100% correct in my assessment that iOS source code is not public which proves every single point i made beyond any doubt. Not a matter of opinion whatsoever.
All you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable.
That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven.
At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M.
Get real.
In software security, not proven to be secure = not secure
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security
Prove it.
https://security.apple.com/bounty/