If disagreement about strategy was the cause for Intel’s decline you’d have to ask yourself just how effective the board of the company is/was.

From where I’m looking strategy doesn’t account for the ongoing engineering issues with fundamental bugs in their chips, or the never ending parade of “more of the same”.

Right now there’s an Intel CPU available at every single price point between expensive and absurd and very little to distinguish between them other than price.

An “Intel Inside” sticker used to be advertising, now it’s a warning label.

We really got a lot of ceo drama recently. Are these parasites turning on each to where it is going public?