• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Really? I’ve had more trouble with DisplayPort since I keep forgetting about the locking feature and bust the jacket off.

        I honestly prefer HDMI cables, but I hate the closed nature of the HDMI standard.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It “clicks” when inserted, and you have to have really small fingers, do magic and wiggle at the same time to get the damn cable out without ripping some hardware out.

            It’s a big strong head too, no need for these click teeth IMO.

        • a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They make display port cables without the locking feature. I don’t have a link unfortunately but I have a few in my box of cables that I’m definitely going to use one day

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think I’ve had one HDMI connector get bent out of shape, and I’ve broken 2 or 3 DP cables due to the locking bit. And I’ve only been using DP for 5 years and have used HDMI for >10 (15?). The DP lock is solving a problem I’ve never had, while creating one I never considered to be an issue.

            So I honestly prefer HDMI in general, and I’d have no reason to care about DP if HDMI standards people weren’t such thugs. But alas, DP has basically won the PC, so I guess I’ll get used to the clip.

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Now I wonder how strict they’ll actually be with the standard? 2.1 is a mess because you can call just about anything 2.1 now.

    And then it takes forever for companies to adopt it.

    • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I can definitely see the difference between a 1440p 27 inch display vs a 5k 27 inch display, add in high refresh rate and HDR and you already are close to exceeding the DP 2.0 maximum bandwidth (without display stream compression). I wish we could finally get decent high DPI monitors on desktops that aren’t made by or for apple Macs

      • LaggyKar@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Though that’s not where you would use HDMI. I would argue for TV:s, 4k is generally enough, and HDMI 2.1 already has enough bandwidth for 4k 120 Hz 12 bit-per-color uncompressed.

        But DisplayPort, yeah, that could use a bit more.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    80 gigabit is a crazy amount of bandwidth, and it seems like HDMI will leapfrog that?

  • flemtone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    And how much are they charging to support the new standard ? DisplayPort is at least free and open.