• MrSoup@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Could bluesky have won over Mastodon because of the fediverse barrier where people doesn’t know which server to choose?

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Now someone have to write a server to federate to Bluesky, if for nothing more, as a reality check.

    • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s exactly it. People are bad at tech and do not understand it. If you even give them an additional option, this may confuse a tremendous amount of people enough to simply lose interest.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s the thing, though. Bluesky gives you that option, too. And you could always just sign up with the one big official Mastodon server.

        IIRC, they got hammered with new users back when Mastodon was more popular, and they couldn’t keep up (since every server is run on a shoestring). So, they put s moratorium on new accounts, forcing people onto other instances. That might’ve been what hurt adoption.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          Not really. Bluesky has a server option, but it’s filled with their main instance by default and you can just ignore it.

          Mastodon, on the other hand, doesn’t have a single entry point for registrations. Everything is more convoluted for the layperson.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I use both. I’ve been on Mastodon for the better part of a year and only actively tried Bluesky the last couple months. My Bluesky feed is thriving, whereas Mastodon not so much. IMO this is due to Mastodon is missing the major quality of life features of Bluesky.

      • Add lists
      • Subscribable block lists
      • Custom subscribable topic feeds
      • Optional recommendation engine

      These things make Bluesky very easy to get started with and more powerful even than Xitter was. It’s simply a better product if you have any requirements other than federation. Getting a good feed up and running doesn’t take more than an hour or two. Mastodon is a lot more work.

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I think that’s a good part of it, to be honest. Plus I think also helps that Bluesky’s handles look visually less confusing and unusual than the conventional double @ sign for the fediverse

      @user.bsky.social vs @user@bsky.social

      Plus other things like having starter packs