boem@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoUN report says world is racing to well past warming limit as carbon emissions rise instead of plungeenglish.elpais.comexternal-linkmessage-square187fedilinkarrow-up1596arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1591arrow-down1external-linkUN report says world is racing to well past warming limit as carbon emissions rise instead of plungeenglish.elpais.comboem@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square187fedilinkfile-text
On Friday, the globe hit 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees) above pre-industrial levels for the first time in recorded history
minus-squareF_Haxhausen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·8 months agoNo it is not. Eugenics is an attempt to improve the genetic quality of a human population. We are talking about an attempt to stop climate change. We are not trying to “improve” the genetics of human population.
minus-squareBoomkop3@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-28 months agoEugenics sounds good at first, but human greed and corruption makes it an incredibly dangerous tool that should probably not be in the hands of anyone
minus-squareF_Haxhausen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoI don’t think eugenics sounds good.
minus-squareBoomkop3@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoI’ve heard too many people (mostly elderly) speak out for it. It’s definitely a bad idea
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·8 months ago We are talking about an attempt to stop climate change those are the trappings, but the method is bare eugenics
minus-squareF_Haxhausen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·8 months agoNo it is not. Eugenics is a pseudo-science about improvement of genetics. Period. Trying to avoid climate catastrophe is not about improving genetics.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·8 months ago Eugenics is a pseudo-science about improvement of genetics. Period no, it’s not, even the wikipedia article we both love disputes this claim plainly.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·8 months ago Trying to avoid climate catastrophe is not about improving genetics. if the method by which you try to avoid it is eugenicist, then it is.
minus-squareF_Haxhausen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·8 months agoI’m done. I am not into bickering for no reason.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·8 months agoi didn’t ask you to say anything in the first place.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·8 months agothat’s a narrow definition that doesn’t really encompass all the ways in which eugenics has been practiced. frequently, as i have done here, it is used synonymously with genocide. stop practicing genocide.
minus-squareF_Haxhausen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·8 months agoNo. Genocide is murdering people. Genocide is violence against people. Forcing people, against their will to stop existing. Asking people to reproduce less is asking people (not forcing them) to exercise their own will.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·8 months agogenocide is also propaganda that encourages one segment of the population to cease reproduction.
minus-squareWhiteHawk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agothat is true, but eugenics is something very different
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoin this case, it’s a synonymous use. they are totally equivalent in this respect.
minus-squareGabu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 months agoBraindead take. We don’t need more children to be born into a world of suffering.
No it is not. Eugenics is an attempt to improve the genetic quality of a human population.
We are talking about an attempt to stop climate change. We are not trying to “improve” the genetics of human population.
Eugenics sounds good at first, but human greed and corruption makes it an incredibly dangerous tool that should probably not be in the hands of anyone
I don’t think eugenics sounds good.
I’ve heard too many people (mostly elderly) speak out for it. It’s definitely a bad idea
those are the trappings, but the method is bare eugenics
No it is not. Eugenics is a pseudo-science about improvement of genetics. Period.
Trying to avoid climate catastrophe is not about improving genetics.
no, it’s not, even the wikipedia article we both love disputes this claim plainly.
if the method by which you try to avoid it is eugenicist, then it is.
I’m done.
I am not into bickering for no reason.
i didn’t ask you to say anything in the first place.
that’s a narrow definition that doesn’t really encompass all the ways in which eugenics has been practiced. frequently, as i have done here, it is used synonymously with genocide. stop practicing genocide.
No. Genocide is murdering people. Genocide is violence against people. Forcing people, against their will to stop existing.
Asking people to reproduce less is asking people (not forcing them) to exercise their own will.
genocide is also propaganda that encourages one segment of the population to cease reproduction.
that is true, but eugenics is something very different
in this case, it’s a synonymous use. they are totally equivalent in this respect.
Braindead take. We don’t need more children to be born into a world of suffering.