• morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    6 days ago

    Why are they including the samsung galaxy book, which is a laptop but not samsung phones, in a mobile phone comparison?

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    full score on tech sustainability for the company that removed the headphone jack at the same they they releases Bluetooth headphones while their earlier models still can’t call properly! Whoohoo

    • Enkrod@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Eh, if you leave out Fairphone the scoring range is realistic.

      And Fairphone is specifically tailored to reach the highest realistically possible ethics standards. No wonder they crush this. The downside is that their phones are quite expensive relative to phones of comparable power.

  • FundMECFS@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Can some investor pour 100 million or something into fairphone so the phones actually become good?

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      If it’s your average investor, they’ll want a return, which will make fair phone stop being ethical.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      Other than being a bit thick, the Fairphone 5 is actually a very good phone.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yes. Although I don’t know what you mean with “software comparability”.

          I am still on the stock Android it comes with, which works fine but is still infested with Google stuff. I am not sure about the state of alternative ROMs, but I think it is not bad given how relatively new the hardware is. Personally I plan to switch to PostmarketOS or Mobian once that support matures a bit, but it seems to be almost there now.

            • cabbage@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m also a FP5 user, FP3 before that. Never had any problems whatsoever.

              Used /e/ for a while on FP3, that was mostly fine but some annoyances like the camera being less good. So I switched back to stock android. Might try /e/ again soon though.

              I haven’t had any problems with apps, audio, bluetooth, anything.

            • poVoq@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Yeah, no problems with Bluetooth and audio here. Wifi reception is probably the best I ever had on a smart-phone.

    • rollinghills@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      It takes a lot of work and time to build smartphones.

      The Pixel and the iPhone weren’t built overnight.

    • CareHare@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I bought one a couple of years ago, still use it. It’s not that bad, just don’t expect any crazy fluff. It’s the compromise one makes for a sustainable future. Cheaper than most flagships.

      • FundMECFS@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I get that, but as someone on a currently near 8 year old phone, I’ve been told by friends the fairphone will barely last half that long :/.

      • tibi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s a low end smartphone with mid range price and awful security. What’s not to love?

    • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      Good news, you (probably) can! Find a flagship phone you like from a year to three ago, and go buy a gently used one. Buying things used is almost always better for the environment than buying them new.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        So far I can’t find anything that fits me better than a CMF Nothing Phone.

        $240.

        Fairly powerful hardware for that price range.

        Apparently capable of running e/OS

        A shape that has actual flat, easily gripable edges, as opposed to seemingly everything else that is completely rounded.

        (I’ve got a serious wrist/hand injury to my dominant hand, and that makes this last one pretty important)

        Is there anything comparable for all or most of those features, in that price range, capable of being either de googled android, or running an open source and/or privacy oriented os?

        I’ve attempted to look for such a phone, and basically everything is either double or more the cost.

  • waigl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’ve been using a shiftphone for the last ~5 years. I wonder where they would land on the ranking. They should als do fairly well.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    How is Google Pixel that low? They have good software support and support third party roms like GraphineOS better than nearly any other manufacturer.

  • ininewcrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Data is always beautiful if you cherry pick the data you want.

    This is like judging how beautiful someone is by only looking at their hands.

  • tibi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Why the arbitrary ethiscore classification (25% for average and 60% for good? Do they just want Apple to not be red?

  • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    There is no ethical consumption under capitalism, no matter how warm and fuzzy the marketing team is able to make you feel.