• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Not a Chinese Military company. At least at this moment. If and when Xi decides that they want to use information gathered from Tencent for military purposes, they will. Nobody can or will stop him.

  • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Every fucking Chinese company is required to be an arm of their government and provide them with any information they request. It’s not even a question, they are an arm of the Chinese government. They can get fucked

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Yeah it is similar, but not the same (at least not yet).

        China is a one-party state, and the government has control over private enterprise. If you are a Chinese company, the PRC ultimately has control of it, and that means the Chinese military has access to anything you have access to, if they want it.

        This is on a different level than anything Snowden released.

        • holo@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          There are several hundred political parties in China currently in office.

        • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          China is a one-party state I wish you could realise how hilarious it is to read someone comparing the US and China on their number of political parties…

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Oh? So you are saying that there are no functional difference between a federation of 50 states, each with individual (somewhat independent) local and state governments, and the authoritarian CCP?

            When I say “China is a one-party state,” I’m not referring to political parties as we would understand them in the US (Democrat/Republican). I am referring to the actual structure of the government.

            You might want to maybe educate yourself on what a “one-party state” means in this context before trying to make snarky comments.

            • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              You’re right, I’m sorry, I really should educate myself about the US beyond the 40+ years of propaganda I’ve had to endure and the absolutely constant, never ending stream of shit across all media I’m the grateful recipient of, thanks to the Internet™. But honestly, I’m kinda scared I’d actually die if I came to visit.

              Meanwhile, my experience with China over the last ten years or so has left me regularly wondering, in the grand scheme of things, what the fucking difference is. You both are absolutely insane, from where I live.

              But yes, I was totally cherry picking your message. I don’t disagree with you, to be clear. I’m just amused about your choice of epithet.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                No worries… apologies if I was snippy.

                And yeah, the US and China are both insane… Unfortunately for me, as an American, China seems to be the more stable one these days (and it’s only going to get worse starting 1/20).

            • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              I’m being slightly disingenuous by focusing on one expression in the entire message, granted.
              But honestly, using “one party state” as an epiteth, like that’s what you want to focus on that’s badwrong about China? that’s amusing to me, reading this from Europe. YMMV.

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          This is on a different level than anything Snowden released.

          Snowden released the fact that the major internet companies in the US literally have full time CIA staff and locked rooms with servers

          Why is this on a different level? Is it because they’re ASIANS?

          • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            One government is actively committing genocide against subsets of their population I’d say it’s a pretty big fucking difference.

            • holo@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              Yeah the US genocide of black Americans needs the earn them some serious sanctions, but it’s not relevant to this discussion.

          • CharmOffensive@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            The long and short of it is even leftie Americans have internalised American exceptionalism, even if they aren’t cognisant of it. And the right are, well… Racist and don’t want to admit it.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Keep it a note that having them listed as a Chinese military company could let US put pressure against open source groups to not collaborate with them; very similar to how US forced Linux Foundation to kick off decade old russian collaborators.

      • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        do you really think I give a shit about tencent? I just wanted to point out that this could have negative consequences for open source projects. Projects sponsored by them could lose a funding source, or any help work done by them could cease because of this.

        • recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          do you really think I give a shit about tencent?

          Yes, but I don’t understand why.

          I just wanted to point out that this could have negative consequences for open source projects.

          Something tells me the private billion dollar tech conglomerate doesn’t host a lot of “open source” projects.

          Projects sponsored by them could lose a funding source, or any help work done by them could cease because of this.

          That’s true, what sort of wholesome projects would lose funding? I would love to see that they sponsor the world’s largest food bank or help casualties of war get adequate medical treatment or fit for prosthetics (there isn’t a lot of money to be made in philanthropy in case you weren’t aware, i have 0 faith in tencent being benevolent in any way).

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Oh my, the US military might have to change the name of the list to, “Foreign companies we’re blacklisting for classified reasons”. How terrible.

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Sure, go ahead and try to sue the single most powerful entity on the planet.