Yeah, it seems to be a personal mission for Steve, and he seems to be going a bit harder on them as well. I remember the fan controller fire risk thing was like 2-3 videos, each about 10-20 min, whereas recent “investigative journalism” pieces are more like 1-1.5 hours, and the details seem a bit more spread out.
I appreciate what he’s doing, I just wish it was a little less dramatic, but I guess that sells clicks and views.
The way they are phrasing things is very sensationalist. They are very much not doing dry, factual content.
This probably is required to make a profit, but too me is still drama.
At this rate Steve is going to end up offed or cancelled in some kind of way, he keeps digging deeper.
They are running a drama/scandal focussed channel. Of course they are going to be controversial at times.
Your being downvoted because they cannot handle the truth.
Not really. Reviews and weekly news are still their bread and butter. They do a few of these deep dive investigations per year.
And they do very detailed reviews.
They seem to be doing far more of them lately.
Companies are going to shit more quickly these days
Yeah, it seems to be a personal mission for Steve, and he seems to be going a bit harder on them as well. I remember the fan controller fire risk thing was like 2-3 videos, each about 10-20 min, whereas recent “investigative journalism” pieces are more like 1-1.5 hours, and the details seem a bit more spread out.
I appreciate what he’s doing, I just wish it was a little less dramatic, but I guess that sells clicks and views.
investigative journalism is drama now 👍
The way they are phrasing things is very sensationalist. They are very much not doing dry, factual content. This probably is required to make a profit, but too me is still drama.