• Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    He’s got two days left in office, of course he won’t. He’s got more important shit to focus his attention on.

  • drjkl@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Bad title. Biden won’t enforce it because “Given the sheer fact of timing, this Administration recognizes that actions to implement the law simply must fall to the next Administration, which takes office on Monday”. Trump takes office literally the next day, so he’s going to have to enforce it (or not).

  • WatDabney@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Whether or not this particular ban is enforced is irrelevant. The point was simply to establish the precedent that the government can restrict citizens’ access to social media.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I mean they’re also banning chinese networking hardware, chinese phone manufacturers, chinese software in cars, considering banning chinese drones, potentially banning tencent games, etc etc

      I’m feeling pretty confident that the goal here is banning chinese spying considering all the other bans.

      • WatDabney@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        No government ever oppresses its citizenry by announcing that they’re setting out to oppress the citizenry.

        They always, without exception, do it by first targeting someone the bulk of the populace thinks deserves it, and then only later incrementally expanding their reach.

        • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 hours ago

          That’s true, and that’s why so many internet censorship it spying bills are officially to counter pedophiles.

          Banning tiktok is clearly controversial though, and I honestly don’t think it’s trying to soften people up to the government banning social media.

          • WatDabney@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 hours ago

            That’s true, and that’s why so many internet censorship it spying bills are officially to counter pedophiles.

            Yes.

            But that was just an interim strategy, and could never serve their long-term goal, since all it could allow them to do is to institutionalize the authority to censor in cases of activity already deemed criminal.

            The difference with the TikTok ban is that neither TikTok nor its users have been accused of any crime. This ban is being enacted in spite of the fact that there’s nothing criminal about the site, and that’s a new power.

            I honestly don’t think it’s trying to soften people up to the government banning social media.

            I guarantee that that’s exactly what it’s about.

            It’s not a coincidence that all of the domestic social media overlords have already lined up to swear their fealty to Trump (and to hand him big piles of money). They know which way the wind is blowing, and they’re ensuring that they don’t get TikToked.