Tap for article

Trump calls Zelenskyy a ‘dictator’ as US rift with Ukraine deepens

US president warns Ukrainian leader he ‘better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left’

Donald Trump has called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy a “dictator” and warned that he “better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left”, in a deepening rift between the two leaders.

In a post on his Truth Social platform on Wednesday, the US President hit out at his Ukrainian counterpart hours after Zelenskyy accused Trump of living in a “disinformation bubble” and disputed his $500bn bill for aid to Kyiv.

The bitter exchange comes after Trump upended decades of US policy by convening bilateral talks with Moscow on the Ukraine war without inviting Kyiv and blaming Zelenskyy for the 2022 Russian invasion.

In his most overt threat yet to end the war on terms favourable to Moscow, Trump wrote: “A Dictator without Elections, Zelenskyy better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left.”

He added that Zelenskyy had “talked the United States of America into spending $350 Billion Dollars, to go into a War that couldn’t be won”.

Speaking in Kyiv earlier on Wednesday, Zelenskyy, who was sidelined this week from high-profile talks between the US and Russia in Riyadh over the conflict, blasted Trump for pushing “a lot of disinformation coming from Russia”.

“Unfortunately, President Trump, with all due respect for him as the leader of a nation that we respect greatly . . . is living in this disinformation bubble,” ​he said.

He made his comments as Russian President Vladimir Putin praised the US-Russian rapprochement and argued that European leaders had excluded themselves from the talks.

Zelenskyy’s retort was prompted by Trump’s remarks from his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida on Tuesday, in which the US president falsely claimed Kyiv had started the conflict, the largest on European soil since the second world war.

Trump added he was “very disappointed” that Ukraine was “upset about not having a seat” at Tuesday’s talks in Saudi Arabia.

“Today I heard: ‘Oh, well, we weren’t invited’,” the US president said. “Well, you’ve been there for three years . . . you should have never started it. You could have made a deal.”

Zelenskyy’s comments came a day after the US and Russia agreed to “lay the groundwork for future co-operation” on ending the war, in their first high-profile talks since Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in 2022.

Amid a dramatic reversal of decades of US policy towards Russia, Trump last week announced that he had spoken to Putin about ending the Ukraine war, without consulting Kyiv or its European allies.

In his first comments since his conversation with Trump, Putin said he “highly appreciates” the US-Russia talks in Saudi Arabia, which he said “made the first step to resuming our work on all sorts of issues of mutual interest”.

“The US negotiators were totally different — they were open to a negotiating process without any biases or judgments about what was done in the past,” he said. “They intend to work together.”

Putin said Russia would not “speculate” on US-European relations, but claimed EU leaders had “insulted” Trump during his election campaign and said “they are themselves at fault for what is happening”.

Putin said he would meet Trump “with pleasure” but that any summit required substantial preparation.

On Wednesday, Zelenskyy pushed back against Trump’s suggestion that elections should be held in Ukraine, after the US president claimed that his Ukrainian counterpart had an approval rating of just 4 per cent.

Pointing to polling from the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, which in February found that 57 per cent of Ukrainians trusted their president, Zelenskyy said: “So if anyone wants to replace me right now, that will not work.”

Putin has long sought regime change in Kyiv.

The Ukrainian president also disputed Trump’s claim that Ukraine owed the US $500bn worth of rare minerals and other resources for past military assistance.

Kyiv has spent $320bn on its war efforts against Russia, with $200bn coming from international military assistance, Zelenskyy said.

“The United States has contributed approximately $60bn so far, with an additional $31.5 billion in financial assistance,” he said. “That’s $67bn in weaponry and $31.5bn in direct budgetary support.”

US state department data broadly supports Zelenskyy’s figure for US military support for Ukraine.

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    this is a rift between MAGA and Ukraine.

    or they could say between the US government and Ukraine.

    I still support Ukraine and most Harris voters and many traditional Republicans (Eisenhower type) do, too.

    I hope that the Biden admin did a good job of building them up and building Europe up to last through 2-4 years of a potential MAGA administration. Even if they were confident it wouldn’t happen. Hope for the best and prepare for the worst and all that.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Self projection again? The official white house xitter account published an AI generated image of a turd with a crown, officially stating that the USA are now ruled by a king with absolute power

  • tazzy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    The government of the USA is horrifying.

    It’s crazy to witness everything happening, in 10 years when the USA is best allies with Russia and they are invading all other countries and starting wars and the USA has no check and balances people will look back and ask why they didn’t do anything to stop it.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The government of the USA is horrifying

      The lack of pushback is equally concerning.

      If a foreign actor had directly attacked the Americans, they would be up in arms ready to “glass parking lot” whatever country had attacked them, but this attack from the inside (though partially pupprteered from abroad) is going almost entirely unchallenged (and barely noticed inside the country thanks to a mostly captured and complicit media).

    • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      This transition will not take 10 years. It has barely been a month since the new administration took over and they’re well on their way to fundamentally changing the USA for the foreseeable future.

  • Wren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The “Day One” Dictator who idolizes Hitler, Pooh Bear, and Putin says what?

  • jamie_oliver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m pissed at the american people.

    Without getting into insults and earning a ban, they voted for this guy.

  • Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Fix your fucking country, Americans. I’m legit getting a nervous eye twitch from reading the news these days.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      tell us what to do!! we tried voting and our educational system is so sabotaged that we do not know what else is possible

    • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      It is just getting started. You have not seen anything yet. We have if we are lucky 3 years more of this. If unlucky this is how it will be going forward.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        If we’re really lucky, 2. If we take congress then they can at least limit his powers or, with a strong enough change, remove him from office. Now, if this happens I don’t expect him to actually accept it and there will still be a fight, but the only real factor that matters at that point is if the military sides with him or the constitution. Right now, he doesn’t have the military support to successfully perform a self coup.

        • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Imagine if the republicans get wiped out in both houses and the dems have enough seats to overcome filibusters and make constitutional amendments.

      • Hubi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Bombing has historically not been the best way to change a country’s stance on anything really.

          • Hubi@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Bombing them didn’t really change the opinions of the Germans though. It just reinforced their stance on the “total war” and they kept going until they were obliterated. I guess a point could be made about Japan though.

              • Hubi@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                That’s obviously not what I mean. I meant the act of bombing will not change anyone’s political orientation. Total destruction and occupation might. But that’s not what this thread is about.