• sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Didn’t read the article.

    I have no clue wtf that technology is in detail but wouldn’t it be easy to have a longer reaction time by supplying enough energy? The news should not be how long the reaction lasted but how long it lasted selfreliant.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I read thorough it for the details.

      It was net negative power, requiring 2MW of power to maintain fusion. The major achievement of this particular experiment was doing so without the fusion reaction damaging the containing assembly.

      It was purely a test/demonstration of the containment of fusion-like conditions.