• rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    if there was a stronger signal then epidemiology it would have been stated in the first article.

    The site is called “techexplorist”, really doesn’t strike me as the kind of publication to support their medical claims with cited studies.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sure. Anyway, I’m not a fan of alcohol, but it has enough bad things we can prove it does, no reason to use weaker evidence to try to make it more dangerous