I mean the US already sent too much to Ukraine. European members can hardly add much, UK sent bascially all of their SPGs to Ukraine for example. 6 months ago, Ukraine used 15% of US ATACMS stockpile. US six months ago only had 2,000 ATACMS left. Iskander production last year was around 360 (which outpaced use) and Russia has plans to produce 750 this year. US and their European allies are having their stockpiles bled dry and why send more for a country that clearly ain’t going to make it? As far as I can tell, most Russian units aren’t even in Ukraine and I suspect late April is going to be interesting considering I see signs of a possible Re-Invasion of Ukraine but take that with a grain of salt.
🤡
Think of it however you want, someone else here stated that freezing it is just means that all that aid goes into Trump’s pockets instead which is certainly a good argument for unfreezing this aid and sending it into Ukraine anyways even if it won’t achieve much in the end.
Personally I think it is smarter if Europe keeps their stockpiles in country and prepare for a future war with Russia and the American aid gets sent to NATO allies instead.
Just say that you last saw it with some Ukrainian chap near the border and now you can’t find it.
Good
Why
I think we should be using more money to fix problems inside the states first rather than outside
Sure, but the politicians freezing aid are just going to pocket the money. It definitely isn’t going to things like education, poverty, infrastructure
Yeah. I wish things weren’t the way they currently are
Buddy’s a bootlicking retard who follows a dementia ridden rapist. Good for you
Go fuck yourself.
