cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agoOpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square172fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkOpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.comcyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agomessage-square172fedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-219 hours agoIt is bwcause a human artist is usually inspired and uses knowledge to create new art and AI is just a mediocre mimic. A human artist doesn’t accidentally put six fingers on people on a regular basis. If they put fewer fingers it is intentional.
minus-squaremimavox@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 hours agoThat’s where I don’t agree. I don’t subscribe to the view that LLMs merely are “stochastic parrots”.
minus-squareMagicShel@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·16 hours agoIf your argument is that it depends on the quality of the output, then I definitely shouldn’t be allowed to look at art or read books.
It is bwcause a human artist is usually inspired and uses knowledge to create new art and AI is just a mediocre mimic. A human artist doesn’t accidentally put six fingers on people on a regular basis. If they put fewer fingers it is intentional.
That’s where I don’t agree. I don’t subscribe to the view that LLMs merely are “stochastic parrots”.
If your argument is that it depends on the quality of the output, then I definitely shouldn’t be allowed to look at art or read books.