A U.K. woman was photographed standing in a mirror where her reflections didn't match, but not because of a glitch in the Matrix. Instead, it's a simple iPhone computational photography mistake.

A U.K. woman was photographed standing in a mirror where her reflections didn’t match, but not because of a glitch in the Matrix. Instead, it’s a simple iPhone computational photography mistake.

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    0·
    8 months ago

    I’m aware that’s it’s possible, but that isn’t part of the onboarding or anything. What I mean is, it’s an addon. It was never part of the original iteration, which was just “look moving Harry Potter photos.”

    It’s a gimmick that doesn’t even work cross device, because it’s literally just a short video.

    • locuester@lemmy.zipEnglish
      0·
      8 months ago

      I’m not following where you’re coming from. Are you just going to hate on it?

      Because v1 of something didn’t have a feature, it means it should be discounted from discussion?

      There’s several neat things about Live Photos, and the arguably nearest thing is being able to change the key frame. Unintended side effect of this feature apple included, maybe. But that’s not relevant.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        0·
        8 months ago

        I’m simply stating that they are short videos. The fact that they can do more is secondary, platform specific, and gimmicky. You send that “love photo” to an android device, a PC, an older iPhone, etc it all falls apart and it’s literally just a short video again.

        The ability to change the “cover image” doesn’t mean it’s meant to allow you to pick the perfect frame, that’s just a secondary feature. You’re still sending the entire short video along.

        • locuester@lemmy.zipEnglish
          1·
          8 months ago

          But… no? When I change the key frame (the image) of the video, then send that to someone as a picture, the picture is of that key frame. If I send over iMessage as Live Photo, it’s both a pic and a video.

          So it gives the the ability to slightly adjust when the picture was taken to get that perfect shot with no one blinking and things look just right. Basically, every picture is like 50 pictures and I can pick the best. By default, it picks the middle.

          Call it what you want, but it’s integrated pic + vid on every picture. Yes. Coupled with simple tools to leverage that for some nice functionality.

          If your argument is just “but it’s simple, it’s just a video” then you’re ignoring the UX execution entirely.