A massive aviation industry clearinghouse that processes data for twelve billion passenger flights per year is selling that information to the Trump administration amid the White House’s new immigration crackdown, according to documents reviewed by the Lever.

The data — including “full flight itineraries, passenger name records, and financial details, which are otherwise difficult or impossible to obtain” for past and future flights — is fed into a secretive government intelligence operation called the Travel Intelligence Program and provided to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other federal agencies, records reveal.

Details of this program were outlined in procurement documents released Wednesday by ICE, which is a division of the Department of Homeland Security.

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Since when does a government agency have to pay for receiving a companies data? I guess there is no law for allowing ICE to access that data, and then they just pay instead?

    • FloMo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      If I had to guess, obtaining the data by force may require a court order or legal process.

      Buying data that someone else is willingly selling bypasses those steps.

    • nevm@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      At least for foreigners travelling into the US, you’re willingly giving the US govt most of this information up front anyway via the APIS. And paying for the privilege!

      • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Well you could have easily not fucking come here.

        Americans are just fucked (and they stole the election so we get to be hated for voting for him while we didn’t even vote for him, our allies have every excuse not to lift a finger to care. Really convenient.)

        • nevm@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Unless of course you’re forced to, like for your job. My place would have little to zero sympathy for my personal reasons not to travel unless it’s on a govt advisory not to.

    • ILoveUnions@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah that’s one of the things that stood out as what the hell… the companies already have the data, if ICE wanted it legally they shouldn’t need to pay… Really shows how shady they’re being.

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    As long as programs like 5-Eyes exist you just have to assume every time you interact with a company it is in the hands of all of the governments.

    • gradual@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      But useful idiots on lemmy keep telling me it’s china doing all the surveillance through companies.

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I drive everywhere. Yeah, I know, fuck cars. But honestly they’re tracking everyone’s movement. Have you noticed all of the intersection cameras that have popped up everywhere? Fuck the authoritarian surveillance state.

    • moseschrute@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      They don’t need cameras. Your phone is constantly connecting to cell towers and broadcasting its unique identifier. Those towers keep a record of who has connected. So long as your in range of 3 or more towers they can triangulate your location.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          No, passengers is the correct way of saying it. A flight can have hundreds of passengers. A person is a passenger every time they fly a leg on a plane.

          Also it’s “passenger flights” in the OP, which would be a record of a passenger on a flight. If a person took 4 flights in one journey, that would count as 4 “passenger flights”.

    • Joe Dyrt@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      One person can have multiple flights per year. Its still a huge number considering the billions in Asia who never fly.

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Everyone is stealing your data and selling it. Feeding it into AI. Building profiles on you to better send you ads.

    Yes. Literally every company. There’s no regulation so to them it’s free money.

  • nuko147@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    The company is jointly owned by nine major airlines, most of which are US-based: Delta, Southwest, United, American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, JetBlue, Air Canada, Lufthansa, and Air France.

    I hope EU starts some investigation, because it doesn’t seem this follows the GDPR for European travelers.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Assuming the data doesn’t include international departures or arrivals (only their domestic counterparts), would GDPR even apply?

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think it applies to eu citizens worldwide for online purposes. You only need to do business in eu with eu clients (seperate terms) for it to apply.

        • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yea, I guess because they are “selling” vs being compensated for? If the US govt dictates terms to that business under homeland security, GDPR probably wouldn’t matter, but I can only assume since it’s a sale, that’s not the case.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Maximum GDPR fine is 4% of your revenue. For Lufthansa, that would be ~$1.4 billion, Air France ~$650 million, both of which are roughly their entire net income for one year.

        Not sure if anyone has been hit with the maximum ever though, as everyone just keeps track of the dollars and not percentage of revenue.

          • mriswith@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            I think the biggest one by value is Meta with €1.2b. Although their revenue is in the $150b+ range, so not maxed out.

  • PartyAt15thAndSummit@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Nice racket. First you pay the airlines for their tickets, then the ICE with your tax dollars to buy your data from said airlines.

  • Prehensile_cloaca @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Cue the airlines come with hand-wringing to beg the Feds for more bailouts because “nobody is flying anymore.”

    Parasitical business practices should lead to market exit.