By doing this, they’ve also ironically managed to disprove their own point of supposedly only enforcing the rules. Bit of a shame, as the idea of the community seemed nice, but I thought the mod was really out of line there.
Oh well, you better believe I’ll be back downvoting in 74 years!
Unfounded accusations of using AI are really shitty. I’m not going to bat for anyone banned for doing it.
Fair. I didn’t see that original post where they’ve made the accusation, so I admit it could have been shitty enough to warrant a ban. But there’s that and then there’s getting banned for 2 downvotes.
That is a good point. The way the message was organized screamed AI though: emoji in headers, bold headers, the “not just __ - it means __” that LLMs love em dashes and so much more. If you go back through my comments I have no problem with AI generated text. I agree is sounds like an accusation, but it wasn’t necessarily meant in a negative, “this is bad” way.