We Finally Have Proof That the Internet Is Worse::High-profile lawsuits against Google and Amazon have revealed Silicon Valley’s vise grip on our lives.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well clearly expecting to be paid for doing shit that anyone anywhere does for free is the problem. What’s the point of the journalist?

    • ominouslemon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait, what do you think journalists do? Do you think that they wake up, get to their workplace and start typing away about whatever crosses their mind? In that case, I can understand your confusion.

      On the other hand, if you know what journalists actually do, I don’t understand what you’re saying. Or perhaps you think that reasearching information on a topic, interviewing people, going to your town hall to see what politicians are up to, go to warzones and report about what’s happening, are tasks that “anyone anywhere does for free”?

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can you imagine what it would be like if the only people doing journalism were those paid by publishers? The real journalists are everyone with a phone who are where the story is happening.

        • ominouslemon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Bullshit. Those can be sources, but they are not journalists. I beg you to look up what a journalist does, because you clearly do not know it and you’re making a fool of yourself. Doing journalism is not as simple as saying “This thing happened”.

          A person with a smartphone does not do research, does not interview people, does not spend all day working on a story, does not have the support of other people whose job is to know stuff, does not try to understand what the implications of something are, does not have a code of ethics, etc etc. Journalists spend 100% of their day working on a story and that makes all the difference in the world. It’s a job with specific duties. " Citizen journalism" is not journalism. YouTube personalities are not influencers. People researching stuff in their free time are not journalists.

          Recording something with your smartphone and posting it on Instagram does not make you a journalist, just as me cooking pasta for lunch does not make me a chef.

          And that’s because - again - doing something for fun or by accident is very different than doing it as a job. I guess your skepticism may come from not yet having encountered good journalism, and I’m sorry if that’s the case. My advice is just to keep looking for it, because finding a news org that you can trust makes all the difference in how you can understand the world.

          • Mango@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            People interview themselves. We have phones and want to be heard! We don’t need your leading questions. We don’t need your input. We don’t want it and we won’t pay you for it!

            • ominouslemon@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t know if you just want to be edgy, if you’re just thick, or if a journalist fucked your mom, but I have the impression that you’re not gonna care anyways, no matter the amount of level-headed arguments.

              Good journalism is dying, you’re being played like a fiddle, and I hope you’re gonna soon realize how wrong you are and how much we need journalism.

              For me, this conversation ends here. Peace