sunnie@lemmy.ca to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 年前no.. just nolemmy.caimagemessage-square95linkfedilinkarrow-up1564arrow-down119
arrow-up1545arrow-down1imageno.. just nolemmy.casunnie@lemmy.ca to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 年前message-square95linkfedilink
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down4·2 年前That’s XML though… not that I’m disagreeing.
minus-squarehuginn@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down1·2 年前Not XML. JSX. It’s javascript’s answer to markup.
minus-squarekarmiclychee @sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 年前It’s like a weaponized grade of whatever they made CSS in JS out of
minus-squarehuginn@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 年前If you put it into an XML parser it will throw an error, so it’s no longer XML. Sure it was based on it, but it’s not xml.
That’s XML though… not that I’m disagreeing.
Not XML. JSX. It’s javascript’s answer to markup.
Gross.
The worst of both worlds…
It’s like a weaponized grade of whatever they made CSS in JS out of
deleted by creator
If you put it into an XML parser it will throw an error, so it’s no longer XML.
Sure it was based on it, but it’s not xml.