Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant has outlined Israel’s plans for the next phase of its assault on the besieged Gaza Strip and future scenarios for the day after the war ends.
“In the northern region of the Gaza strip, we will transition to a new combat approach in accordance with military achievements on the ground,” Gallant’s office said in a statement it said outlined the guiding principles reflecting Gallant’s vision for the next phases of the war on Thursday.
He said operations would include raids, demolishing tunnels, air and ground strikes, and special forces operations.
In the south of the besieged enclave – where most of Gaza’s 2.3 million population is now living, many in tents and other temporary shelters – the operation would continue to try to eliminate Hamas leaders and rescue Israeli hostages.
"It will continue for as long as is deemed necessary,” the statement said.
“As long as is deemed necessary,” roughly translates to, “As long as Palestinians exist as an ethnic group,”
Ah, so that’s why they do not actually try to kill them…?
Why are they not just bombing those 2 millions is that is the case? Why use roof knocking and then precision bombs when they actually want to kill them all?
Dropping 2000lb bombs in refugee camps is not “precision bombs”
“precise enough.”
For context, the largest bomb dropped by the US in Iraq and Afghanistan in a populated area was 500 pounds.
The New York Times: Visual Evidence Shows Israel Dropped 2,000-Pound Bombs Where It Ordered Gaza’s Civilians to Move for Safety
Then why does it fit so well with Israel’s history of violently conquering their neighbors?
Refuge camp by name only or actual refuge camp?
Man, upwards of 90% of ALL munitions expended in Afghanistan by Coalition forces were guided ‘smart’ munitions. Afghanistan, as you may note, is not incredibly densely populated.
Israel has been using about 50% ‘dumb’ unguided munitions in Gaza, one of the most densely populated regions in the world.
Tales of exceptional precision in this campaign are propaganda bullshit.
Even if all the males 14+ are automatically considered combatants, the civilian death ratio would be 70% minimum (being women and children). That’s on top of Israel creating a famine, extreme water crisis, destroying the majority of medical infrastructure, and extremely limiting foreign aid (to a fraction of what was needed prior to Oct 7).
Sure, Isreal does technically have the capability to completely destroy Palestine in one quick operation, for instance, it could just use some of its almost certain to exist nuclear weapons on the relatively small area of Gaza. However, consider for a moment what the actual consequences of that or a similarly destructive action would be: Isreal may be powerful in its region, but it is not a global superpower after all. It receives considerable support from other countries, particularly the US and much of the EU, and losing that support, or even worse, managing to actually draw their anger, would put them in a dangerously vulnerable position with a fairly small population and land area and enemies on all sides. As it stands, their current actions have made supporting them somewhat divisive and politically charged in the west, but havent broadly lost them support, but doing something that blatantly indefensible might just be enough to do that. Further, the current Isreali government from my understanding doesnt have a perfect grip on popular support and power, and doing something that heinous might risk losing them domestic support as well.
Because they would be instantly villified and the world would need to react swiftly with shock and awe to overwhelm the military and remove the country’s leadership.
This way, the Zionists get to relish in hearing of daily murders, slowly and torturously eliminating a race of people they deem to be subhuman, for months and years to come with the implicit support of an uncaring world.
They don’t have the ordinance to do that, nor the means to fight a war on more than one front when the Arab world justifiably retaliates.
Are you trying to say the close to 30,000 people they have killed were intentional then? If they try not to kill anyone they didn’t mean to kill? Or am I misunderstanding you?