Use words

You’re lazy and stupid.

If i do as you said, i can select some comments out of context that will invalidate your point.

My point was that he said a thing. You can go look to see if he did. You’re lazy.

You chose instead to reside in your mind palace and make ditzy, sophomoric philosophical statement.

As for Ukraine war crime, i haven’t read and i’m busy but i’m guessing they probably exist.

You’re stupid. Not only are you apparently proud of not reading, you lack comprehension in reading just this argument. You’ve changed the subject to be about whether or not nazis have committed war crimes. So I guess it opens the possibility that you’re just a cynical nazi doing apologism.

Either way, what a worthless interaction you’ve inflicted upon me.

Don’t be lazy

So you take this group of nazis that has locked people inside burning buildings, and you contrast their war crimes favorably to their enemies by singling out “mercy killings” as if that’s the only thing they’ve done. Contrasted by multiple superlatives towards the enemy’s spectrum of war crimes you couldn’t even list.

I never said you support war crimes; I implied you support nazis.

I no longer feel sympathy towards the french for ‘le meme’ because it turns out that’s actually how you act

I went looking in their post history for the incitement to make this complaint and saw that they were denying nazi warcrimes in the Ukraine war by calling their side’s acts “mercy killings”

You should have realized that I adapt my tone to the one I respond to, by like, reading?

See? You literally just say shit that has no connection to reality. Here you claim to read. You have proven to everyone that you do not. Not only by your ignorant handling of the original comment you replied to, but also now by ignoring both my statement and reasoning behind pointing out that you DO NOT adapt your tone to the one you’re responding to!

Nothing you say means anything because everything you say is predetermined by your attitude alone. You don’t read. Even if you did it would have no effect on what your opinion or response is. It has been shown now twice.

I don’t think we have the same definition of reasonable, might have been lost in translation I guess.

For someone now saying there isn’t an argument, you sure did use three consecutive angry adjectives in the same sentence to respond to their comment.

You’ve got quite the imbalance of nerve and self reflection, crying about people being aggressive and acting like unhinged assholes after how you just acted.

All you do is illustrate how profoundly meaningless your words are. You use the same invective to someone being reasonable as you do someone scolding you.

You’ve convinced everyone with an attention span too short to read their comment and believe they can get the gist by reading the shorter response.

Anyone who actually read their comment and your description rightly see you as cowardly, stupid, and unhinged.

Your backhanded way of avoiding an argument is to paint their comment in a certain light and ignore its content. I haven’t seen anyone say this obvious truth out loud yet so I will.

You can’t fool me. We use the same word for ‘defederation’ except you have sloppy pen work and leave marks all over it

Fascinating

Oh! Let me guess what your problem with that comment is!

“Pointing out racism is uncivil and deserves undivided scorn”

My guess is influenced by the fact that there isn’t much else to have a problem with

What an odd question to ask in the first place then!

I think it’s quite funny that you want to defederate from an instance and you don’t know what federation is or how it works.

This is how:

Perhaps you should just log off instead of publicly crying about how someone made fun of you for having a bad opinion

Anyway, I’m heading back to the fucking Kremlin lmao. I’ll leave you to lauding nazis for their ‘mercy killings’