I think this is the point, because Harvard got rid of the SAT requirement, and then just brought it back.

It’s a really terrible measure .

But it is an equal measure, despite what it measuring moderately meaningless.

I don’t think we have a better answer yet, because everything else lacks any sort of comparable equivalency .

And I say this as an ADHD sufferer who is at a huge disadvantage on standardised testing

He mentioned that he wants to create Second level Nat, that will require new IP addresses and DHCP in the subnet

TrueNas scale is a little heavier because it is a kubernetes implementation, but it is amazing.

The capabilities and possibilities are spectacular, and the maintenance required to keep all of your applications up-to-date is so easy that I no longer think about it.

What’s your cooling solution?

Could it be throttling the cpu?

2gb memory is not nearly enough.

No, But there’s BIG money in AI astroturfing for elections.

Simpsons did it best….

…. Won’t someone pleeeease think of the children!

Tale as old as time (yes I know your answer was /sarcastic)

Each event should be judged on its own merits. They can each have different causes.

That being said, our “isolated western society” which is creating more people disconnected from everyone, likely yields clues to why it seems to be growing.

Interesting username combined with your point.

I agree, but I also can understand why he chose what he did.

I agree.

I just feel like I understand why navalny went back to Russia, despite the obvious threat to his life.

Sometimes there are things a person chooses to do that are bigger than themselves.

He chose to allow himself to be a martyr. Hopefully it makes a difference, but it very likely may not.

Who knows, maybe his sacrifice paves the way for his successor.

Sure, but the topic is “rf interference of your camera feeds”

You CAN interfere with Ethernet, but it’s much harder to do, as evidenced by your 100 watts

Sure, but still harder to do than wifi

Maybe, but guns are a very different problem.

A toddler won’t kill their sibling with this by accident.

Clearly criminals who steal cars will DEFINITELY listen to this new law banning their tools.

I can concede to that… there will be some grey area, but the idea that “there is no true photo” or “there is no truth” feels wrong.

I think the line (while the details may be certainly difficult) is along “are you making the existing image/story clearer or are you changing the narrative of the media?

When the story you get from the image changes, then you’ve crossed the line.

That’s a great example of what goes wrong, and it was amazing to get the news on it.

“By the way, you’re now an invading force, surprise!”

It has a very “zap Brannigan” feel to it

I think that’s disingenuous…

There’s a clear difference between a processing mistake and an intentional addition. That’s a fairly clear line. Grain on a photo is not the same as making you look like a human head on a shark’s body.

Yes, no photo is 100% accurate, just as no statement will ever capture an incident perfectly. That doesn’t mean there’s no such thing as lying.

There is definitely a line.

Is the tech trying to make the photo more accurate, or change the narrative?

Sure, there’s some tech that’s awkwardly in the middle, like skin smoothing, but we don’t NEED that, and it’s not directly changing the narrative of the story, unless you’re selling acne medication.

Mostly a “cost” basis, but it’s an assumption for the Google assistant for sure. Siri I’ve tested.