This is so nice… Thanks.
This is so nice… Thanks.
Understood. Thanks. I really wish they would allow people to upload their own games. Kinda like that old website (Newgrounds? idk).
This statement is completely wrong. Like, to a baffling degree. It kinda makes me wonder if you’re trolling.
No I just struggle at getting my meaning across + these stuff are new to me. What I meant was ‘Go does memory management LIKE a VM does’. Like ‘baking in the GC’. Does that make sense? Or am I still wrong?
I know about all this — I actually began implementing my own JVM language a few days ago. I know Android uses Dalvik btw. But I guess a lot of people can use this info; infodump is always good. I do that.
btw I actually have messed around with libgcc-jit and I think at least on x86, it makes zero difference. I once did a test:
– Find /e/ with MAWK -> 0.9s – Find /e/ with JAWK -> 50s.
No shit! It’s seriously slow.
Now compare this with go-awk: 19s.
Go has reference counting and heap etc, basically a ‘compiled VM’. I think if you want fast code, ditch runtime.
I think that happens when app developers learn2optimize. Stop using interpreted bytecode languages on small processors!
My man we have UNIX because PDP-11 was expensive!
Thanks. I actually have a parse-related question which I will post somewhere soon (as in 2-3 minute).
I will download it all and mirror it on my server and Github pages. Hate to see it go. What happened to this dude? Was he old or young?
What should we talk about then, glob patterns (which are NOT regular expressions, for the love of all that is holy and unholy, stop calling glob patterns RE!)
Removed by mod
That’s what they are doing with Fandom (formerly Wikia). Right?
Uh apologies. I did not realize that.
I don’t understand. Am I doing something against the rules of this instance? I have posted stuff like this before?
You showed up! So, about this, you see how ‘let’ binding does not allow you to add parameters right? (the val binding does) I think this is a good place to use tacitness. I will basically add Perl-like, POSX-shell-like features. To further add concatativenss, I shall add OCaml-style shell (|>). I will take a page from F#'s book and add a ‘<|’ too. I was originally planning to have these two operators be defined orthogonal-like via the operator binders (infix, infixr etc) but I think it’s necessary to bake them in.
So any other cool stuff? I plan on having intrinsics like ‘add’ and ‘or’ etc. Since it is translated down to C, I will add a two-way FFI, similar to the language I am writing it in, Cyclone Scheme.
THANKS.
Cool. I can’t see the implementation though? Thanks a lot man. Really means a lot. @Corbin knows a lot more though. (since I called Rust a ‘shitlang’ I realize you may be ironic — Since Rust is more of a ‘fandom’ than a ‘compiler’, but I’m not going to offend you by assuming so. If you are truly giving me props, it’s really appreciated! :D )
No problem my good man. Have fun.
(Sorry if this is a double post) I think what you call ‘decoration’ I call 'augmentation;. After many iterations ,I came up with this AST: https://pastebin.com/NA1DhZF2
I like it, but I am still skeptical as of comitting to it. I really want to use Functors… But i’m nto sure how. These are new concepts to me!
Thanks! You know last night I fed a model several books and asked it a lot of stuff. This did not come up.
What i do is I glance at the book, then ask the model to explain it to me. I call the model ‘Urkel the Wiz Kid’.
I fed both CS books and CE books. Like Sipsers, A Quantative Approach, Automata of Aho, Harris and Harris, etc.
Thanks for your help my good man.