• 0 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle





  • Hard to say if he’s right given how much of this is behind-the-scenes business dealing. I honestly didn’t think much about them ending support for the game, since it had been so long since it was released. Still, announcing they were going to support the game until 2025 and then ending updates the same year their sequel game is supposed to launch isn’t a great look. Especially since Evil Empire was still talking about continuing updates last year. Makes it seem like a sudden decision on Motion Twin’s end. It’s impossible to say for sure, but it really feels like they didn’t want their old game serving as competition. Hopefully Evil Empire is able to recover and start work on their own project.






  • I mean, every “Mon” series has to deal with the fact that your basically making animals fight for your amusement, but that this is somehow a good and normal part of the world that the player shouldn’t think too much about. But yeah, unless the game is trying to actually comment on that aspect of the genre then it’s probably best not to even bring it up. Palworld is an interesting case. What with the guns, putting pals to work, and butchering them for resources. Admittedly, I haven’t played the game, but it really doesn’t paint the player in the best light. You’re certainly not an innocent ten-year old off an adventure. If anything you’d be a villain in a Pokemon game. But it’s difficult to say how hard the game wants you to think about that. Like, is the fact that the game lets you do all these things the developers way of saying “Being a Mon trainer would be really messed up if these games were realistic” or is it part of the “Pokemon with Guns!” attitude that has been a big part of the marketing?

    Either way, I think that a game that focused on building a cooperative relationship between a “trainer” and their Mons would be interesting. Like instead of just capturing them and sticking them in a PC you would need to actually work to keep them satisfied and willing to follow you. Kind of like SMT mechanics, but more of a constant relationship you have to manage. Could get tedious, but it’s an interesting idea.






  • Neither the article or the blog post really give any concrete details about the deal, so it’s hard to say how bad it really is. I guess it all depends on how you define “fair” compensation for a person’s voice. The fact that so many voice actors weren’t even informed about it is concerning though. Obviously there has to be some confidentiality, but it’s odd how many voice actors seem surprised by the deal if it was made after consulting union members who were going to be affected.